Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.10.10 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.10.10 33210488!8800676!33210488     free     free     free Warning: Undefined variable $yww in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 538 Warning: Undefined variable $yww in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 538       Zhejiang+Da+Xue+Xue+Bao+Yi+Xue+Ban 2020 ; 49 (5): 609-613 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33210488|t=2020. Comparison of three medical goggle sterilizing approaches |pdf=|usr=}}{{33210488}} gab.com Text Comparison of three medical goggle sterilizing approaches JO: Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33210488 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: To compare three sterilizing methods for reusable medical goggles. METHODS: A total of 180 medical goggles of the same brand and same model were randomly divided into three groups. In group A the goggles were first soaked with 2000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant and then cleaned manually; goggles in other two groups were sterilized using pre-programmed automatic spray cleaning and disinfection machine, the disinfection program was set to 90 ? for 5 min in group B and 70 ? for 30 min in group C. The quality of the sterilization was monitored by visual inspection with luminous magnifying glass and residual protein detection assay. User satisfaction on cleanliness of medical goggles, clarity of mirror surface and suitability of elastic bands was investigated with questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The qualification rates verified by visual inspection were 82.4%, 84.6%and 98.3%in group A, B and C, respectively, the qualification rate in group C was significantly higher than those in group B and group C (all P<0.05). The qualification rates verified by residual protein detection assay were 96.7%, 100.0%and 100.0%in group A, B and C, respectively (P>0.05). A total of 54 questionnaires were submitted for the survey. The satisfaction rates were 100.0%, 90.7%and 94.4% for cleanliness of medical goggles, clarity of mirror surface and suitability of elastic bands, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Machinery sterilization set 70 ? for 30 min has better cleaning and sterilizing effects for reusable medical goggles. Twit Text FOAVip Comparison of three medical goggle sterilizing approaches ????Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33210488 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33210488 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33210488}}</ref> Comparison of three medical goggle sterilizing approaches #MMPMID33210488 Wang Q; Mo J; Huang F; Pu Y; Lyu B Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2020[Oct]; 49 (5): 609-613 PMID33210488show ga OBJECTIVE: To compare three sterilizing methods for reusable medical goggles. METHODS: A total of 180 medical goggles of the same brand and same model were randomly divided into three groups. In group A the goggles were first soaked with 2000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant and then cleaned manually; goggles in other two groups were sterilized using pre-programmed automatic spray cleaning and disinfection machine, the disinfection program was set to 90 ? for 5 min in group B and 70 ? for 30 min in group C. The quality of the sterilization was monitored by visual inspection with luminous magnifying glass and residual protein detection assay. User satisfaction on cleanliness of medical goggles, clarity of mirror surface and suitability of elastic bands was investigated with questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The qualification rates verified by visual inspection were 82.4%, 84.6%and 98.3%in group A, B and C, respectively, the qualification rate in group C was significantly higher than those in group B and group C (all P<0.05). The qualification rates verified by residual protein detection assay were 96.7%, 100.0%and 100.0%in group A, B and C, respectively (P>0.05). A total of 54 questionnaires were submitted for the survey. The satisfaction rates were 100.0%, 90.7%and 94.4% for cleanliness of medical goggles, clarity of mirror surface and suitability of elastic bands, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Machinery sterilization set 70 ? for 30 min has better cleaning and sterilizing effects for reusable medical goggles. |*Eye Protective Devices/standards[MESH] |*Sterilization/methods[MESH] Comparison of three medical goggle sterilizing approaches (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing