Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.101 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.101 33203534!9760258!33203534     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       World+Neurosurg 2021 ; 146 (ä): e359-e367 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33203534|t=2021. Clinicians User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33203534}} gab.com Text Clinicians User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 JO: World Neurosurg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33203534 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Restricted access to hospitals due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly altered practice patterns for elective neurosurgical care. Particularly, telemedicine has become the primary modality of patient visits for nonemergent conditions. This study aimed to characterize user experiences of neurosurgeons and advanced practice providers focusing on perceived utility and barriers of telemedicine in management of elective neurosurgical patients during COVID-19. METHODS: An online survey was sent to clinicians involved in neurosurgical care using telemedicine with questions focusing on frequency of utilization, duration of patient encounters, benefits of telemedicine, and barriers to current forms of remote patient visits. Survey responses were stratified by clinical position (neurosurgeon vs. advanced practice provider) and subspecialty focus (cranial vs. spinal neurosurgery). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 14 of 17 eligible clinicians. Respondents included 10 neurosurgeons and 4 APPs with 57% specializing in cranial neurosurgery and 43% specializing in spinal neurosurgery. During the COVID-19 period, 78% of respondents used teleconference/video conference visits multiple times in a week, and 86% planned to continue using telemedicine after the pandemic. The most common barrier for telemedicine was the inability to perform a neurological examination, while the most common perceived benefit was increased convenience for patients. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 period, telemedicine was heavily relied on to ensure the continuation of perioperative care for patients with elective neurosurgical pathologies. While clinicians identified numerous barriers for current telemedicine platforms, the use of telemedicine will likely continue, as it has provided unique benefits for patients, clinicians, and hospitals. Twit Text FOAVip Clinicians User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 ????World Neurosurg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33203534 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33203534 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33203534}}</ref> Clinicians User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 #MMPMID33203534 Ryu WHA; Kerolus MG; Traynelis VC World Neurosurg 2021[Feb]; 146 (ä): e359-e367 PMID33203534show ga BACKGROUND: Restricted access to hospitals due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly altered practice patterns for elective neurosurgical care. Particularly, telemedicine has become the primary modality of patient visits for nonemergent conditions. This study aimed to characterize user experiences of neurosurgeons and advanced practice providers focusing on perceived utility and barriers of telemedicine in management of elective neurosurgical patients during COVID-19. METHODS: An online survey was sent to clinicians involved in neurosurgical care using telemedicine with questions focusing on frequency of utilization, duration of patient encounters, benefits of telemedicine, and barriers to current forms of remote patient visits. Survey responses were stratified by clinical position (neurosurgeon vs. advanced practice provider) and subspecialty focus (cranial vs. spinal neurosurgery). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 14 of 17 eligible clinicians. Respondents included 10 neurosurgeons and 4 APPs with 57% specializing in cranial neurosurgery and 43% specializing in spinal neurosurgery. During the COVID-19 period, 78% of respondents used teleconference/video conference visits multiple times in a week, and 86% planned to continue using telemedicine after the pandemic. The most common barrier for telemedicine was the inability to perform a neurological examination, while the most common perceived benefit was increased convenience for patients. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 period, telemedicine was heavily relied on to ensure the continuation of perioperative care for patients with elective neurosurgical pathologies. While clinicians identified numerous barriers for current telemedicine platforms, the use of telemedicine will likely continue, as it has provided unique benefits for patients, clinicians, and hospitals. |*Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH] |COVID-19/*epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |Elective Surgical Procedures/methods/trends[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Neurosurgeons/*trends[MESH] |Neurosurgical Procedures/methods/*trends[MESH]Clinicians User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COV(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing