Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e389 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e389 33200594!7669460!33200594     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33200594&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Korean+Med+Sci 2020 ; 35 (44): e389 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33200594|t=2020. Manual Fever Check Is More Sensitive than Infrared Thermoscanning Camera for Fever Screening in a Hospital Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33200594}} gab.com Text Manual Fever Check Is More Sensitive than Infrared Thermoscanning Camera for Fever Screening in a Hospital Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic JO: J Korean Med Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33200594 #FOAvip Between August 31st and September 4th 2020 in a tertiary care hospital in Seoul, the fever detection rate by infrared thermoscanning camera at the gates was 0.002% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.001%-0.006%) and that by manual fever check at the outpatient clinics was 0.02% (95% CI, 0.01%-0.03%) (P < 0.001). The difference strongly suggests that sensitivity of the thermoscanning camera in the market must be upgraded. Twit Text FOAVip Manual Fever Check Is More Sensitive than Infrared Thermoscanning Camera for Fever Screening in a Hospital Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic ????J Korean Med Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33200594 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33200594 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33200594}}</ref> Manual Fever Check Is More Sensitive than Infrared Thermoscanning Camera for Fever Screening in a Hospital Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic #MMPMID33200594 Jung J; Kim EO; Kim SH J Korean Med Sci 2020[Nov]; 35 (44): e389 PMID33200594show ga Between August 31st and September 4th 2020 in a tertiary care hospital in Seoul, the fever detection rate by infrared thermoscanning camera at the gates was 0.002% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.001%-0.006%) and that by manual fever check at the outpatient clinics was 0.02% (95% CI, 0.01%-0.03%) (P < 0.001). The difference strongly suggests that sensitivity of the thermoscanning camera in the market must be upgraded. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology[MESH] |Fever/*diagnosis[MESH] |Hospitals[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infrared Rays[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Manual Fever Check Is More Sensitive than Infrared Thermoscanning Came(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing