Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042626 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042626 33184088!7662139!33184088     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMJ+Open 2020 ; 10 (11): e042626 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33184088|t=2020. What items should be included in an early warning score for remote assessment of suspected COVID-19? qualitative and Delphi study |pdf=|usr=}}{{33184088}} gab.com Text What items should be included in an early warning score for remote assessment of suspected COVID-19 qualitative and Delphi study JO: BMJ Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33184088 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: To develop items for an early warning score (RECAP: REmote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care) for patients with suspected COVID-19 who need escalation to next level of care. METHODS: The study was based in UK primary healthcare. The mixed-methods design included rapid review, Delphi panel, interviews, focus groups and software development. Participants were 112 primary care clinicians and 50 patients recovered from COVID-19, recruited through social media, patient groups and snowballing. Using rapid literature review, we identified signs and symptoms which are commoner in severe COVID-19. Building a preliminary set of items from these, we ran four rounds of an online Delphi panel with 72 clinicians, the last incorporating fictional vignettes, collating data on R software. We refined the items iteratively in response to quantitative and qualitative feedback. Items in the penultimate round were checked against narrative interviews with 50 COVID-19 patients. We required, for each item, at least 80% clinician agreement on relevance, wording and cut-off values, and that the item addressed issues and concerns raised by patients. In focus groups, 40 clinicians suggested further refinements and discussed workability of the instrument in relation to local resources and care pathways. This informed design of an electronic template for primary care systems. RESULTS: The prevalidation RECAP-V0 comprises a red flag alert box and 10 assessment items: pulse, shortness of breath or respiratory rate, trajectory of breathlessness, pulse oximeter reading (with brief exercise test if appropriate) or symptoms suggestive of hypoxia, temperature or fever symptoms, duration of symptoms, muscle aches, new confusion, shielded list and known risk factors for poor outcome. It is not yet known how sensitive or specific it is. CONCLUSIONS: Items on RECAP-V0 align strongly with published evidence, clinical judgement and patient experience. The validation phase of this study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04435041. Twit Text FOAVip What items should be included in an early warning score for remote assessment of suspected COVID-19 qualitative and Delphi study ????BMJ Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33184088 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33184088 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33184088}}</ref> What items should be included in an early warning score for remote assessment of suspected COVID-19? qualitative and Delphi study #MMPMID33184088 Greenhalgh T; Thompson P; Weiringa S; Neves AL; Husain L; Dunlop M; Rushforth A; Nunan D; de Lusignan S; Delaney B BMJ Open 2020[Nov]; 10 (11): e042626 PMID33184088show ga BACKGROUND: To develop items for an early warning score (RECAP: REmote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care) for patients with suspected COVID-19 who need escalation to next level of care. METHODS: The study was based in UK primary healthcare. The mixed-methods design included rapid review, Delphi panel, interviews, focus groups and software development. Participants were 112 primary care clinicians and 50 patients recovered from COVID-19, recruited through social media, patient groups and snowballing. Using rapid literature review, we identified signs and symptoms which are commoner in severe COVID-19. Building a preliminary set of items from these, we ran four rounds of an online Delphi panel with 72 clinicians, the last incorporating fictional vignettes, collating data on R software. We refined the items iteratively in response to quantitative and qualitative feedback. Items in the penultimate round were checked against narrative interviews with 50 COVID-19 patients. We required, for each item, at least 80% clinician agreement on relevance, wording and cut-off values, and that the item addressed issues and concerns raised by patients. In focus groups, 40 clinicians suggested further refinements and discussed workability of the instrument in relation to local resources and care pathways. This informed design of an electronic template for primary care systems. RESULTS: The prevalidation RECAP-V0 comprises a red flag alert box and 10 assessment items: pulse, shortness of breath or respiratory rate, trajectory of breathlessness, pulse oximeter reading (with brief exercise test if appropriate) or symptoms suggestive of hypoxia, temperature or fever symptoms, duration of symptoms, muscle aches, new confusion, shielded list and known risk factors for poor outcome. It is not yet known how sensitive or specific it is. CONCLUSIONS: Items on RECAP-V0 align strongly with published evidence, clinical judgement and patient experience. The validation phase of this study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04435041. |*Checklist[MESH] |*Early Warning Score[MESH] |*Telemedicine[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Confusion[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnosis/physiopathology[MESH] |Delphi Technique[MESH] |Disease Progression[MESH] |Dyspnea[MESH] |Fever[MESH] |Heart Rate[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Hypoxia[MESH] |Myalgia[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnosis/physiopathology[MESH] |Qualitative Research[MESH] |Risk Assessment[MESH] |Risk Factors[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Time Factors[MESH]What items should be included in an early warning score for remote ass(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing