Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.envres.2020.110439 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110439 33171119!7836796!33171119     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Environ+Res 2021 ; 193 (ä): 110439 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33171119|t=2021. Online trade in wildlife and the lack of response to COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33171119}} gab.com Text Online trade in wildlife and the lack of response to COVID-19 JO: Environ Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33171119 #FOAvip Wildlife trade has been widely discussed as a likely origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. It remains unclear how the main actors in the wildlife trade chain responded to these discussions and to the campaigns advocating wildlife trade bans. We analyzed the content of ~20,000 posts on 41 Facebook groups devoted to wild pet trade and ran a breakpoint and a content analysis to assess when and how the COVID-19 pandemic was incorporated into the discourse within trade communities. Only 0.44% of advertisements mentioned COVID-19, mostly after WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. No traders discussed the role of trade in spreading diseases; instead, posts stimulated the trade in wild species during lockdown. COVID-19 potentially offers persuasive arguments for reducing wildlife trade and consumption. This effect was not demonstrated by on-the-ground actors involved in this market. Bans in wildlife trade will not be sufficient and additional strategies are clearly needed. Twit Text FOAVip Online trade in wildlife and the lack of response to COVID-19 ????Environ Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33171119 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33171119 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33171119}}</ref> Online trade in wildlife and the lack of response to COVID-19 #MMPMID33171119 Morcatty TQ; Feddema K; Nekaris KAI; Nijman V Environ Res 2021[Feb]; 193 (ä): 110439 PMID33171119show ga Wildlife trade has been widely discussed as a likely origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. It remains unclear how the main actors in the wildlife trade chain responded to these discussions and to the campaigns advocating wildlife trade bans. We analyzed the content of ~20,000 posts on 41 Facebook groups devoted to wild pet trade and ran a breakpoint and a content analysis to assess when and how the COVID-19 pandemic was incorporated into the discourse within trade communities. Only 0.44% of advertisements mentioned COVID-19, mostly after WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. No traders discussed the role of trade in spreading diseases; instead, posts stimulated the trade in wild species during lockdown. COVID-19 potentially offers persuasive arguments for reducing wildlife trade and consumption. This effect was not demonstrated by on-the-ground actors involved in this market. Bans in wildlife trade will not be sufficient and additional strategies are clearly needed. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |Animals[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Conservation of Natural Resources[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Online trade in wildlife and the lack of response to COVID-19 (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing