Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1073/pnas.2008256117

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.2008256117
suck pdf from google scholar
33168735!7703537!33168735
unlimited free pdf from europmc33168735    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33168735      Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2020 ; 117 (47): 29748-29758
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Marine wild-capture fisheries after nuclear war #MMPMID33168735
  • Scherrer KJN; Harrison CS; Heneghan RF; Galbraith E; Bardeen CG; Coupe J; Jagermeyr J; Lovenduski NS; Luna A; Robock A; Stevens J; Stevenson S; Toon OB; Xia L
  • Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020[Nov]; 117 (47): 29748-29758 PMID33168735show ga
  • Nuclear war, beyond its devastating direct impacts, is expected to cause global climatic perturbations through injections of soot into the upper atmosphere. Reduced temperature and sunlight could drive unprecedented reductions in agricultural production, endangering global food security. However, the effects of nuclear war on marine wild-capture fisheries, which significantly contribute to the global animal protein and micronutrient supply, remain unexplored. We simulate the climatic effects of six war scenarios on fish biomass and catch globally, using a state-of-the-art Earth system model and global process-based fisheries model. We also simulate how either rapidly increased fish demand (driven by food shortages) or decreased ability to fish (due to infrastructure disruptions), would affect global catches, and test the benefits of strong prewar fisheries management. We find a decade-long negative climatic impact that intensifies with soot emissions, with global biomass and catch falling by up to 18 +/- 3% and 29 +/- 7% after a US-Russia war under business-as-usual fishing-similar in magnitude to the end-of-century declines under unmitigated global warming. When war occurs in an overfished state, increasing demand increases short-term (1 to 2 y) catch by at most approximately 30% followed by precipitous declines of up to approximately 70%, thus offsetting only a minor fraction of agricultural losses. However, effective prewar management that rebuilds fish biomass could ensure a short-term catch buffer large enough to replace approximately 43 +/- 35% of today's global animal protein production. This buffering function in the event of a global food emergency adds to the many previously known economic and ecological benefits of effective and precautionary fisheries management.
  • |*Fisheries[MESH]
  • |*Fishes[MESH]
  • |*Food Security[MESH]
  • |*Models, Theoretical[MESH]
  • |*Nuclear Warfare[MESH]
  • |Animals[MESH]
  • |Biomass[MESH]
  • |Climate Change[MESH]
  • |Computer Simulation[MESH]
  • |Conservation of Natural Resources[MESH]
  • |Oceans and Seas[MESH]
  • |Russia[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box