Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1007/s11739-020-02547-1

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s11739-020-02547-1
suck pdf from google scholar
33159283!7646717!33159283
unlimited free pdf from europmc33159283    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33159283      Intern+Emerg+Med 2021 ; 16 (4): 1043-1049
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Using gel for difficult mask ventilation on the bearded patients: a simulation-based study #MMPMID33159283
  • Althunayyan SM; Mubarak AM; Alotaibi RN; Alharthi MZ; Aljanoubi MA; Alshabanat S; Mobrad AM
  • Intern Emerg Med 2021[Jun]; 16 (4): 1043-1049 PMID33159283show ga
  • The beard is a well-known cause of difficult mask ventilation due to excessive air leaks. Various techniques have been proposed to overcome this difficulty, such as applying a gel on the mask edge. Our objective was to determine whether the gel technique will improve ventilation and to assess the comfort of the provider. A randomized crossover design was conducted to assess the efficacy of gel in a bearded simulation model. Respiratory therapists (RT) were recruited by convenience sampling to hold the mask using a two-handed technique for a two-minute ventilation session. During the session, the ventilator provided a fixed Tidal Volume (TV) of 550 mL and a respiratory rate of 12 per minute, and the simulated model measured the received volumes. We compared the median TV and number of failed ventilation attempts with or without the gel. The comfort level while using the gel was assessed with constructed questions. We recruited 74 respiratory therapists working in Riyadh city. More than half of the participants had more than 5 years experience. The median tidal volume for standard mask ventilation without the gel was 283 mL [interquartile range (IQR) 224, 327], whereas that with the gel was 467 mL [451, 478], respectively (p < 0.01). The number of successful ventilations was recorded out of 24 breaths during the 2-min ventilation period for each technique; the proportion of successful ventilations increased significantly by 65% (95% CI 51-75%, p < 0.01) with the gel. In addition, only nine participants believed the technique was not comfortable, while the remaining individuals found it comfortable or natural. In our bearded simulation model, applying the gel significantly improved ventilation without negatively affecting comfort. Further studies and education are encouraged in the field of basic airway management.
  • |*Face[MESH]
  • |*Gels[MESH]
  • |*Hair[MESH]
  • |*Laryngeal Masks[MESH]
  • |Cross-Over Studies[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Manikins[MESH]
  • |Respiration, Artificial/*instrumentation[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box