Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/medethics-2020-106821 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/medethics-2020-106821 33154088!7848060!33154088     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Med+Ethics 2021 ; 47 (2): 78-85 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33154088|t=2021. Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?|pdf=|usr=}}{{33154088}} gab.com Text Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk JO: J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33154088 #FOAvip Mandatory vaccination, including for COVID-19, can be ethically justified if the threat to public health is grave, the confidence in safety and effectiveness is high, the expected utility of mandatory vaccination is greater than the alternatives, and the penalties or costs for non-compliance are proportionate. I describe an algorithm for justified mandatory vaccination. Penalties or costs could include withholding of benefits, imposition of fines, provision of community service or loss of freedoms. I argue that under conditions of risk or perceived risk of a novel vaccination, a system of payment for risk in vaccination may be superior. I defend a payment model against various objections, including that it constitutes coercion and undermines solidarity. I argue that payment can be in cash or in kind, and opportunity for altruistic vaccinations can be preserved by offering people who have been vaccinated the opportunity to donate any cash payment back to the health service. Twit Text FOAVip Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk ????J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33154088 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33154088 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33154088}}</ref> Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk? #MMPMID33154088 Savulescu J J Med Ethics 2021[Feb]; 47 (2): 78-85 PMID33154088show ga Mandatory vaccination, including for COVID-19, can be ethically justified if the threat to public health is grave, the confidence in safety and effectiveness is high, the expected utility of mandatory vaccination is greater than the alternatives, and the penalties or costs for non-compliance are proportionate. I describe an algorithm for justified mandatory vaccination. Penalties or costs could include withholding of benefits, imposition of fines, provision of community service or loss of freedoms. I argue that under conditions of risk or perceived risk of a novel vaccination, a system of payment for risk in vaccination may be superior. I defend a payment model against various objections, including that it constitutes coercion and undermines solidarity. I argue that payment can be in cash or in kind, and opportunity for altruistic vaccinations can be preserved by offering people who have been vaccinated the opportunity to donate any cash payment back to the health service. |*Dissent and Disputes[MESH] |*Health Policy[MESH] |*Patient Acceptance of Health Care[MESH] |Altruism[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH] |Coercion[MESH] |Freedom[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Mandatory Programs/*ethics[MESH] |Motivation/*ethics[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Public Health/ethics[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing