Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.7705/biomedica.5478

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7705/biomedica.5478
suck pdf from google scholar
33152192!7676841!33152192
unlimited free pdf from europmc33152192    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33152192&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33152192      Biomedica 2020 ; 40 (Supl. 2): 80-95
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Cloroquina y sus derivados en el manejo de la COVID-19: una revision sistematica exploratoria #MMPMID33152192
  • Pimentel J; Andersson N
  • Biomedica 2020[Oct]; 40 (Supl. 2): 80-95 PMID33152192show ga
  • Introduction: Recently, researchers from China and France reported on the effectiveness of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 viral replication in vitro. Timely dissemination of scientific information is key in times of pandemic. A systematic review of the effect and safety of these drugs on COVID-19 is urgently needed. Objective: To map published studies until March 25, 2020, on the use of chloroquine and its derivates in patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods: We searched on PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, and 15 registries from the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for theoretical and empirical research in English, Spanish, Italian, French, or Portuguese until March 25, 2020, and made a narrative synthesis of the results. Results: We included 19 records and 24 trial registries (n=43) including 18,059 patients. China registered 66% (16/24) of the trials. Nine trials evaluate chloroquine exclusively and eight hydroxychloroquine. The records are comments (n=9), in vitro studies (n=3), narrative reviews (n=2), clinical guidelines (n=2), as well as a systematic review, an expert consensus, and a clinical trial. Conclusions: One small (n=26), non-randomized, and flawed clinical trial supports hydroxychloroquine use in patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for more clinical trial results to determine the effect and safety of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19.
  • |Antiviral Agents/adverse effects/pharmacology/*therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus/*drug effects/physiology[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Drug Treatment[MESH]
  • |Chloroquine/adverse effects/pharmacology/*therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Clinical Trials as Topic[MESH]
  • |Compassionate Use Trials[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*drug therapy[MESH]
  • |Cytokine Release Syndrome/drug therapy[MESH]
  • |Drug Repositioning[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects/pharmacology/*therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Multicenter Studies as Topic[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*drug therapy[MESH]
  • |Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic[MESH]
  • |Registries[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Treatment Outcome[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box