Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s13643-020-01512-5 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s13643-020-01512-5 33148320!7640992!33148320     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Syst+Rev 2020 ; 9 (1): 256 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33148320|t=2020. A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33148320}} gab.com Text A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic JO: Syst Rev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33148320 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a sense of urgency in the research community in their bid to contribute to the evidence required for healthcare policy decisions. With such urgency, researchers experience methodological challenges to maintain the rigour and transparency of their work. With this in mind, we offer reflections on our recent experience of undertaking a rapid Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis (QES). METHODS: This process paper, using a reflexive approach, describes a rapid QES prepared during, and in response to, the COVID-19 pandemic. FINDINGS: This paper reports the methodological decisions we made and the process we undertook. We place our decisions in the context of guidance offered in relation to rapid reviews and previously conducted QESs. We highlight some of the challenges we encountered in finding the balance between the time needed for thoughtfulness and comprehensiveness whilst providing a rapid response to an urgent request for evidence. CONCLUSION: The need for more guidance on rapid QES remains, but such guidance needs to be based on actual worked examples and case studies. This paper and the reflections offered may provide a useful framework for others to use and further develop. Twit Text FOAVip A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic ????Syst Rev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33148320 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33148320 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33148320}}</ref> A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID33148320 Biesty L; Meskell P; Glenton C; Delaney H; Smalle M; Booth A; Chan XHS; Devane D; Houghton C Syst Rev 2020[Nov]; 9 (1): 256 PMID33148320show ga BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a sense of urgency in the research community in their bid to contribute to the evidence required for healthcare policy decisions. With such urgency, researchers experience methodological challenges to maintain the rigour and transparency of their work. With this in mind, we offer reflections on our recent experience of undertaking a rapid Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis (QES). METHODS: This process paper, using a reflexive approach, describes a rapid QES prepared during, and in response to, the COVID-19 pandemic. FINDINGS: This paper reports the methodological decisions we made and the process we undertook. We place our decisions in the context of guidance offered in relation to rapid reviews and previously conducted QESs. We highlight some of the challenges we encountered in finding the balance between the time needed for thoughtfulness and comprehensiveness whilst providing a rapid response to an urgent request for evidence. CONCLUSION: The need for more guidance on rapid QES remains, but such guidance needs to be based on actual worked examples and case studies. This paper and the reflections offered may provide a useful framework for others to use and further develop. |*Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology/virology[MESH] |*Decision Making[MESH] |*Evidence-Based Medicine[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology/virology[MESH] |*Publishing[MESH] |*Research Design[MESH] |*Review Literature as Topic[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Data Accuracy[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Qualitative Research[MESH]A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing