Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1159/000511900 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1159/000511900 33147591!7801972!33147591     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Eur+Neurol 2020 ; 83 (6): 622-625 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33147591|t=2020. Patients Experiences of Remote Neurology Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33147591}} gab.com Text Patients Experiences of Remote Neurology Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic JO: Eur Neurol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33147591 #FOAvip Telemedicine has been widely implemented during the COVID-19 global pandemic to enable continuity of care of chronic illnesses. We modified our general neurology clinic to be conducted using remote audio-only telephone consultations. We included all patients over a 10-week period who agreed to both a telephone consultation and a questionnaire afterwards in order to ascertain the patient's perspective of the experience. There were 212 participants consisting of men (43.8%) and women (56.2%). The mean +/- standard deviation of age was 47.8 +/- 17.0 (range 17-93) years. For the most part, patients found remote consultations either "just as good" (67.1%) or "better" (9.0%) than face-to-face consultations. Those who deemed it to be "not as good" were significantly older (52.3 +/- 17.9 years vs. 46.6 +/- 16.6 years, p =0.045) or were more likely to have a neurological disorder that required clinical examination, namely, a neuromuscular condition (66.7%, p = 0.002) or an undiagnosed condition (46.7%, p = 0.031). At the height of the COVID-19 global pandemic, most patients were satisfied with remote consultations. The positive feedback for remote consultations needs to be verified outside of this unique scenario because the results were likely influenced by the patients' apprehension to attend the hospital amongst other factors. Twit Text FOAVip Patients Experiences of Remote Neurology Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic ????Eur Neurol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33147591 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33147591 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33147591}}</ref> Patients Experiences of Remote Neurology Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic #MMPMID33147591 McKenna MC; Al-Hinai M; Bradley D; Doran E; Hunt I; Hutchinson S; Langan Y; O'Rourke D; Qasem R; Redmond J; Troy E; Doherty CP Eur Neurol 2020[]; 83 (6): 622-625 PMID33147591show ga Telemedicine has been widely implemented during the COVID-19 global pandemic to enable continuity of care of chronic illnesses. We modified our general neurology clinic to be conducted using remote audio-only telephone consultations. We included all patients over a 10-week period who agreed to both a telephone consultation and a questionnaire afterwards in order to ascertain the patient's perspective of the experience. There were 212 participants consisting of men (43.8%) and women (56.2%). The mean +/- standard deviation of age was 47.8 +/- 17.0 (range 17-93) years. For the most part, patients found remote consultations either "just as good" (67.1%) or "better" (9.0%) than face-to-face consultations. Those who deemed it to be "not as good" were significantly older (52.3 +/- 17.9 years vs. 46.6 +/- 16.6 years, p =0.045) or were more likely to have a neurological disorder that required clinical examination, namely, a neuromuscular condition (66.7%, p = 0.002) or an undiagnosed condition (46.7%, p = 0.031). At the height of the COVID-19 global pandemic, most patients were satisfied with remote consultations. The positive feedback for remote consultations needs to be verified outside of this unique scenario because the results were likely influenced by the patients' apprehension to attend the hospital amongst other factors. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Neurology[MESH] |*Patient Satisfaction[MESH] |*Telemedicine[MESH] |*Telephone[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Age Factors[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |Ambulatory Care[MESH] |Ambulatory Care Facilities[MESH] |Epilepsy[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Headache Disorders[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Movement Disorders[MESH] |Multiple Sclerosis[MESH] |Neuromuscular Diseases[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Peripheral Nervous System Diseases[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Sex Factors[MESH] |Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH]Patients Experiences of Remote Neurology Consultations during the COV(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing