Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3390/medicina56110580 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/medicina56110580 33143030!7692272!33143030     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Medicina+(Kaunas) 2020 ; 56 (11): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33143030|t=2020. Universal Healthcare in the United States of America: A Healthy Debate |pdf=|usr=}}{{33143030}} gab.com Text Universal Healthcare in the United States of America: A Healthy Debate JO: Medicina (Kaunas) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33143030 #FOAvip This commentary offers discussion on the pros and cons of universal healthcare in the United States. Disadvantages of universal healthcare include significant upfront costs and logistical challenges. On the other hand, universal healthcare may lead to a healthier populace, and thus, in the long-term, help to mitigate the economic costs of an unhealthy nation. In particular, substantial health disparities exist in the United States, with low socio-economic status segments of the population subject to decreased access to quality healthcare and increased risk of non-communicable chronic conditions such as obesity and type II diabetes, among other determinants of poor health. While the implementation of universal healthcare would be complicated and challenging, we argue that shifting from a market-based system to a universal healthcare system is necessary. Universal healthcare will better facilitate and encourage sustainable, preventive health practices and be more advantageous for the long-term public health and economy of the United States. Twit Text FOAVip Universal Healthcare in the United States of America: A Healthy Debate ????Medicina (Kaunas) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33143030 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33143030 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33143030}}</ref> Universal Healthcare in the United States of America: A Healthy Debate #MMPMID33143030 Zieff G; Kerr ZY; Moore JB; Stoner L Medicina (Kaunas) 2020[Oct]; 56 (11): ä PMID33143030show ga This commentary offers discussion on the pros and cons of universal healthcare in the United States. Disadvantages of universal healthcare include significant upfront costs and logistical challenges. On the other hand, universal healthcare may lead to a healthier populace, and thus, in the long-term, help to mitigate the economic costs of an unhealthy nation. In particular, substantial health disparities exist in the United States, with low socio-economic status segments of the population subject to decreased access to quality healthcare and increased risk of non-communicable chronic conditions such as obesity and type II diabetes, among other determinants of poor health. While the implementation of universal healthcare would be complicated and challenging, we argue that shifting from a market-based system to a universal healthcare system is necessary. Universal healthcare will better facilitate and encourage sustainable, preventive health practices and be more advantageous for the long-term public health and economy of the United States. |*Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2[MESH] |*Universal Health Care[MESH] |Delivery of Health Care[MESH] |Health Status[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |United States/epidemiology[MESH]Universal Healthcare in the United States of America: A Healthy Debate(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing