Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.069 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.069 33139015!7598306!33139015     free     free     free       Biochem+Biophys+Res+Commun 2021 ; 538 (ä): 226-230 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33139015|t=2021. Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33139015}} gab.com Text Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19 JO: Biochem Biophys Res Commun http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33139015 #FOAvip Rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of active COVID-19 infection is one of the cornerstones of pandemic control. With the myriad of tests available in the market, the use of correct specimen type and laboratory-testing technique in the right clinical scenario could be challenging for non-specialists. In this mini-review, we will discuss the difference in diagnostic performance for different upper and lower respiratory tract specimens, and the role of blood and fecal specimens. We will analyze the performance characteristics of laboratory testing techniques of nucleic acid amplification tests, antigen detection tests, antibody detection tests, and point-of-care tests. Finally, the dynamics of viral replication and antibody production, and laboratory results interpretation in conjunction with clinical scenarios will be discussed. Twit Text FOAVip Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19 ????Biochem Biophys Res Commun http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33139015 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33139015 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33139015}}</ref> Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19 #MMPMID33139015 Lai CKC; Lam W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2021[Jan]; 538 (ä): 226-230 PMID33139015show ga Rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of active COVID-19 infection is one of the cornerstones of pandemic control. With the myriad of tests available in the market, the use of correct specimen type and laboratory-testing technique in the right clinical scenario could be challenging for non-specialists. In this mini-review, we will discuss the difference in diagnostic performance for different upper and lower respiratory tract specimens, and the role of blood and fecal specimens. We will analyze the performance characteristics of laboratory testing techniques of nucleic acid amplification tests, antigen detection tests, antibody detection tests, and point-of-care tests. Finally, the dynamics of viral replication and antibody production, and laboratory results interpretation in conjunction with clinical scenarios will be discussed. |COVID-19 Testing/*methods[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19 (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing