Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.718

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.718
suck pdf from google scholar
33132302!ä!33132302

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33132302      Jpn+J+Infect+Dis 2021 ; 74 (4): 359-366
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Development and Validation of a New Prognostic Scoring System for COVID-19 #MMPMID33132302
  • Ma K; Xia Y; Hu B; Zhang Y; Xu X; Zhang N; Xu H
  • Jpn J Infect Dis 2021[Jul]; 74 (4): 359-366 PMID33132302show ga
  • This study aimed to develop and validate a bedside risk analysis system for predicting the clinical severity and prognosis of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In total, 444 COVID-19 patients were included and randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to 2 groups: derivation group and validation group. The new scoring system comprised of the following 8 variables: history of malignant diseases, history of diabetes mellitus, dyspnea, respiratory rate >24 breaths/min, C-reactive protein level >14 mg/L, white blood cell count >8x10(9)/L, platelets count <180 x 10(12)/L, and lymphocyte count <1 x 10(9)/L. The sensitivity analysis revealed that this new scoring system was more efficient than the sequential organ failure assessment scoring system on the first day of admission. The receiver characteristic curve analysis revealed that the new risk scoring predicted the severe cases of COVID-19 infection with an area under the curve of 0.831 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.783-0.879) and 0.798 (95% CI: 0.727-0.869) in the derivation and validation groups, respectively. This proposed risk score system is a fairly reliable and robust tool for evaluating the severity and prognosis of patients with COVID-19. This may help in the early identification of severe COVID-19 patients with poor prognosis, requiring more intense interventions.
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*pathology/*virology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Hospitalization[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Prognosis[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |Risk Assessment/*methods[MESH]
  • |Risk Factors[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box