Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/cbic.202000744 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/cbic.202000744 33119960!8048644!33119960     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Chembiochem 2021 ; 22 (7): 1176-1189 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33119960|t=2021. Optical Biosensors for Virus Detection: Prospects for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33119960}} gab.com Text Optical Biosensors for Virus Detection: Prospects for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 JO: Chembiochem http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33119960 #FOAvip The recent pandemic of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused huge worldwide disruption due to the lack of available testing locations and equipment. The use of optical techniques for viral detection has flourished in the past 15 years, providing more reliable, inexpensive, and accurate detection methods. In the current minireview, optical phenomena including fluorescence, surface plasmons, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and colorimetry are discussed in the context of detecting virus pathogens. The sensitivity of a viral detection method can be dramatically improved by using materials that exhibit surface plasmons or SERS, but often this requires advanced instrumentation for detection. Although fluorescence and colorimetry lack high sensitivity, they show promise as point-of-care diagnostics because of their relatively less complicated instrumentation, ease of use, lower costs, and the fact that they do not require nucleic acid amplification. The advantages and disadvantages of each optical detection method are presented, and prospects for applying optical biosensors in COVID-19 detection are discussed. Twit Text FOAVip Optical Biosensors for Virus Detection: Prospects for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 ????Chembiochem http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33119960 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33119960 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33119960}}</ref> Optical Biosensors for Virus Detection: Prospects for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 #MMPMID33119960 Maddali H; Miles CE; Kohn J; O'Carroll DM Chembiochem 2021[Apr]; 22 (7): 1176-1189 PMID33119960show ga The recent pandemic of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused huge worldwide disruption due to the lack of available testing locations and equipment. The use of optical techniques for viral detection has flourished in the past 15 years, providing more reliable, inexpensive, and accurate detection methods. In the current minireview, optical phenomena including fluorescence, surface plasmons, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and colorimetry are discussed in the context of detecting virus pathogens. The sensitivity of a viral detection method can be dramatically improved by using materials that exhibit surface plasmons or SERS, but often this requires advanced instrumentation for detection. Although fluorescence and colorimetry lack high sensitivity, they show promise as point-of-care diagnostics because of their relatively less complicated instrumentation, ease of use, lower costs, and the fact that they do not require nucleic acid amplification. The advantages and disadvantages of each optical detection method are presented, and prospects for applying optical biosensors in COVID-19 detection are discussed. |Animals[MESH] |Biosensing Techniques/*methods[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH] |Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/*methods[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Optical Biosensors for Virus Detection: Prospects for SARS-CoV-2/COVID(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing