Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1002/rmv.2184

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/rmv.2184
suck pdf from google scholar
33105071!7645866!33105071
unlimited free pdf from europmc33105071    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33105071      Rev+Med+Virol 2021 ; 31 (3): e2184
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via aerosols #MMPMID33105071
  • Comber L; O Murchu E; Drummond L; Carty PG; Walsh KA; De Gascun CF; Connolly MA; Smith SM; O'Neill M; Ryan M; Harrington P
  • Rev Med Virol 2021[May]; 31 (3): e2184 PMID33105071show ga
  • A key consideration in the Covid-19 pandemic is the dominant modes of transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. The objective of this review was to synthesise the evidence for the potential airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via aerosols. Systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Europe PMC and National Health Service UK evidence up to 27 July 2020. A protocol was published and Cochrane guidance for rapid review methodology was adhered to throughout. Twenty-eight studies were identified. Seven out of eight epidemiological studies suggest aerosol transmission may occur, with enclosed environments and poor ventilation noted as possible contextual factors. Ten of the 16 air sampling studies detected SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid; however, only three of these studies attempted to culture the virus with one being successful in a limited number of samples. Two of four virological studies using artificially generated aerosols indicated that SARS-CoV-2 is viable in aerosols. The results of this review indicate there is inconclusive evidence regarding the viability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols. Epidemiological studies suggest possible transmission, with contextual factors noted. Viral particles have been detected in air sampling studies with some evidence of clinical infectivity, and virological studies indicate these particles may represent live virus, adding further plausibility. However, there is uncertainty as to the nature and impact of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and its relative contribution to the Covid-19 pandemic compared with other modes of transmission.
  • |Aerosols/*analysis[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/epidemiology/pathology/*transmission/virology[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |RNA, Viral/*isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity/*physiology[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box