Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1371/journal.pone.0240775

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775
suck pdf from google scholar
33085693!7577497!33085693
unlimited free pdf from europmc33085693    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33085693&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33085693      PLoS+One 2020 ; 15 (10): e0240775
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Is "no test is better than a bad test"? Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of COVID-19 #MMPMID33085693
  • Gray N; Calleja D; Wimbush A; Miralles-Dolz E; Gray A; De Angelis M; Derrer-Merk E; Oparaji BU; Stepanov V; Clearkin L; Ferson S
  • PLoS One 2020[]; 15 (10): e0240775 PMID33085693show ga
  • Testing is viewed as a critical aspect of any strategy to tackle epidemics. Much of the dialogue around testing has concentrated on how countries can scale up capacity, but the uncertainty in testing has not received nearly as much attention beyond asking if a test is accurate enough to be used. Even for highly accurate tests, false positives and false negatives will accumulate as mass testing strategies are employed under pressure, and these misdiagnoses could have major implications on the ability of governments to suppress the virus. The present analysis uses a modified SIR model to understand the implication and magnitude of misdiagnosis in the context of ending lockdown measures. The results indicate that increased testing capacity alone will not provide a solution to lockdown measures. The progression of the epidemic and peak infections is shown to depend heavily on test characteristics, test targeting, and prevalence of the infection. Antibody based immunity passports are rejected as a solution to ending lockdown, as they can put the population at risk if poorly targeted. Similarly, mass screening for active viral infection may only be beneficial if it can be sufficiently well targeted, otherwise reliance on this approach for protection of the population can again put them at risk. A well targeted active viral test combined with a slow release rate is a viable strategy for continuous suppression of the virus.
  • |*Clinical Laboratory Techniques[MESH]
  • |*Uncertainty[MESH]
  • |Antibodies, Viral/blood[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus/genetics/*immunology[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Testing[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnosis/*epidemiology/prevention & control/virology[MESH]
  • |Data Accuracy[MESH]
  • |Diagnostic Errors[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Mass Screening/*methods[MESH]
  • |Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnosis/*epidemiology/prevention & control/virology[MESH]
  • |Prevalence[MESH]
  • |Quarantine/methods[MESH]
  • |Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]
  • |Serologic Tests[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box