Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7326/M20-5834 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7326/M20-5834 33076694!7573931!33076694     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ann+Intern+Med 2021 ; 174 (3): 395-400 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33076694|t=2021. Ethical Framework for Assessing Manual and Digital Contact Tracing for COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33076694}} gab.com Text Ethical Framework for Assessing Manual and Digital Contact Tracing for COVID-19 JO: Ann Intern Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33076694 #FOAvip The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged the traditional public health balance between benefiting the good of the community through contact tracing and restricting individual liberty. This article first analyzes important technical and ethical issues regarding new smartphone apps that facilitate contact tracing and exposure notification. It then presents a framework for assessing contact tracing, whether manual or digital: the effectiveness at mitigating the pandemic; acceptability of risks, particularly privacy; and equitable distribution of benefits and risks. Both manual and digital contact tracing require public trust, engagement of minority communities, prompt COVID-19 testing and return of results, and high adherence with physical distancing and use of masks. Twit Text FOAVip Ethical Framework for Assessing Manual and Digital Contact Tracing for COVID-19 ????Ann Intern Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33076694 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33076694 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33076694}}</ref> Ethical Framework for Assessing Manual and Digital Contact Tracing for COVID-19 #MMPMID33076694 Lo B; Sim I Ann Intern Med 2021[Mar]; 174 (3): 395-400 PMID33076694show ga The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged the traditional public health balance between benefiting the good of the community through contact tracing and restricting individual liberty. This article first analyzes important technical and ethical issues regarding new smartphone apps that facilitate contact tracing and exposure notification. It then presents a framework for assessing contact tracing, whether manual or digital: the effectiveness at mitigating the pandemic; acceptability of risks, particularly privacy; and equitable distribution of benefits and risks. Both manual and digital contact tracing require public trust, engagement of minority communities, prompt COVID-19 testing and return of results, and high adherence with physical distancing and use of masks. |COVID-19/epidemiology/*prevention & control/transmission[MESH] |Contact Tracing/*ethics/legislation & jurisprudence/*methods[MESH] |Geographic Information Systems[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Masks[MESH] |Minority Groups[MESH] |Mobile Applications[MESH] |Pandemics/*prevention & control[MESH] |Physical Distancing[MESH] |Privacy[MESH] |Risk Assessment[MESH] |Smartphone[MESH] |Trust[MESH] |United States[MESH]Ethical Framework for Assessing Manual and Digital Contact Tracing for(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing