Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.diabet.2020.09.008 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.diabet.2020.09.008 33069845!7557293!33069845     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Diabetes+Metab 2021 ; 47 (2): 101201 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33069845|t=2021. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study |pdf=|usr=}}{{33069845}} gab.com Text Effects of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study JO: Diabetes Metab http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33069845 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of the lockdown period on the glycemic balance in patients with GDM. METHODS: A retrospective study in one center (Lille, France) compared two periods: the COVID-19 lockdown of 18 March 2020 to 7 May 2020 versus the same period during 2019. Glucose targets were defined by a capillary fasting glucose target < 5.1mmol/L and/or a 2-hour postprandial capillary glucose < 6.6 mmol/L. GDM control was defined as: good (< 20% of the glycemic values were not within the target range), acceptable (20 to 40% of the glycemic values were not within the target range) or poor (> 40% of the glycemic values were not within the target range). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included in 2019 and 222 in 2020. The same mean number of capillary blood sugar tests was performed by the two groups. Postprandial blood sugar was significantly less well controlled in 2020, with a lower rate of good control (61.6% vs 69.4%) and higher rates of acceptable (24.7% vs 21.8%) and poor control (13.7% and 8.7%) (p < 0.05). Use of insulin therapy was significantly higher in 2020 compared with 2019 (47.7% and 36.2%, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Diabetes control was lower during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, even if follow-up was not impacted. This may be explained by reduced physical activity, modified dietary habits and anxiety during this period. Twit Text FOAVip Effects of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study ????Diabetes Metab http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33069845 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33069845 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33069845}}</ref> Effects of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study #MMPMID33069845 Ghesquiere L; Garabedian C; Drumez E; Lemaitre M; Cazaubiel M; Bengler C; Vambergue A Diabetes Metab 2021[Mar]; 47 (2): 101201 PMID33069845show ga OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of the lockdown period on the glycemic balance in patients with GDM. METHODS: A retrospective study in one center (Lille, France) compared two periods: the COVID-19 lockdown of 18 March 2020 to 7 May 2020 versus the same period during 2019. Glucose targets were defined by a capillary fasting glucose target < 5.1mmol/L and/or a 2-hour postprandial capillary glucose < 6.6 mmol/L. GDM control was defined as: good (< 20% of the glycemic values were not within the target range), acceptable (20 to 40% of the glycemic values were not within the target range) or poor (> 40% of the glycemic values were not within the target range). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included in 2019 and 222 in 2020. The same mean number of capillary blood sugar tests was performed by the two groups. Postprandial blood sugar was significantly less well controlled in 2020, with a lower rate of good control (61.6% vs 69.4%) and higher rates of acceptable (24.7% vs 21.8%) and poor control (13.7% and 8.7%) (p < 0.05). Use of insulin therapy was significantly higher in 2020 compared with 2019 (47.7% and 36.2%, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Diabetes control was lower during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, even if follow-up was not impacted. This may be explained by reduced physical activity, modified dietary habits and anxiety during this period. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Blood Glucose/analysis[MESH] |Diabetes, Gestational/*epidemiology[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Physical Distancing[MESH] |Pregnancy[MESH]Effects of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on gestational diabetes mellitus(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing