Role of telepharmacy in pharmacist counselling to coronavirus disease 2019 patients and medication dispensing errors #MMPMID33059541
Ibrahim OM; Ibrahim RM; Z Al Meslamani A; Al Mazrouei N
J Telemed Telecare 2023[Jan]; 29 (1): 18-27 PMID33059541show ga
INTRODUCTION: Remote pharmacist interventions have achieved much more attention during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, since they reduce the risk of transmission and can potentially increase the access of vulnerable populations, such as patients with COVID-19, to pharmaceutical care. This study aimed to examine differences in rates and types of pharmacist interventions related to COVID-19 and medication dispensing errors (MDEs) across community pharmacies with and without telepharmacy services. METHODS: This was a prospective, disguised, observational study conducted over four months (from March 2020 to July 2020) in 52 community pharmacies (26 with and 26 without telepharmacy) across all seven states of the United Arab Emirates using proportionate random sampling. A standardised data-collection form was developed to include information about patient status, pharmacist interventions and MDEs. RESULTS: The test (telepharmacy) group pharmacies provided pharmaceutical care to 19,974 patients, of whom 6371 (31.90%) and 1213 (6.07%) were probable and confirmed cases of COVID-19, respectively. The control group pharmacies provided care to 9151 patients, of whom 1074 (11.74%) and 33 (0.36%) were probable and confirmed cases of COVID-19, respectively. Rates of MDEs and their subcategories, prescription-related errors and pharmacist counselling errors across pharmacies with telepharmacy versus those without remote services were 15.81% versus 19.43% (p < 0.05), 5.38% versus 10.08% (p < 0.05) and 10.42% versus 9.35% (p > 0.05), respectively. DISCUSSION: This is one of the first studies to provide high-quality evidence of the impact of telepharmacy on COVID-19 patients' access to pharmaceutical care and on medication dispensing safety.
J+Telemed+Telecare 2023 ; 29 (1): 18-27
