Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.33963/KP.15643

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.33963/KP.15643
suck pdf from google scholar
33047942!?!33047942

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33047942&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33047942      Kardiol+Pol 2020 ; 78 (12): 1254-1261
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • An optimal chest compression technique using personal protective equipment during resuscitation in the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized crossover simulation study #MMPMID33047942
  • Malysz M; Smereka J; Jaguszewski M; Dabrowski M; Nadolny K; Ruetzler K; Ladny JR; Sterlinski M; Filipiak KJ; Szarpak L
  • Kardiol Pol 2020[Dec]; 78 (12): 1254-1261 PMID33047942show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for aerosol generating procedures (AGP) in patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID?19) remains challenging. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare 3 chest compression (CC) methods used by paramedics wearing PPE. METHODS: The single?blinded, multicenter, randomized, crossover simulation study involved 67 paramedics wearing PPE AGP. They performed 2?minute continuous CCs in an adult with suspected or confirmed COVID?19 in 3 scenarios: 1) manual CCs; 2) CCs with the TrueCPR feedback device; 3) CCs with the LUCAS 3 mechanical CC device. RESULTS: The depth of CC was more frequently correct when using LUCAS 3 compared with TrueCPR and manual CC (median [IQR] 51 [50-55] mm vs 47 [43-52] mm vs 43 [38-46] mm; P = 0.005). This was also true for the CC rate (median [IQR]102 [100-102] compressions per minute [CPM] vs 105 [98-1114] CPM vs 116 [112-129] CPM; P = 0.027) and chest recoil (median [IQR]100% [98%-100%] vs 83% [60%-92%] vs 39% [25%-50%]; P = 0.001). A detailed analysis of 2?minute resuscitation with manual CCs showed a decrease in compression depth and full chest recoil after 1 minute of CCs. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that during simulated resuscitation with the use of PPE AGP in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID?19, CC with LUCAS 3 compared with manual CCs as well as the TrueCPR essentially increased the CC quality. In the case of manual CCs by paramedics dressed in PPE AGP, it is advisable to change the person performing resuscitation every minute.
  • |*Personal Protective Equipment[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/*methods[MESH]
  • |Cross-Over Studies[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Heart Arrest/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Heart Massage/*instrumentation[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Poland[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box