Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1371/journal.pone.0240503

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0240503
suck pdf from google scholar
33035244!7546502!33035244
unlimited free pdf from europmc33035244    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33035244&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33035244      PLoS+One 2020 ; 15 (10): e0240503
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID33035244
  • Risko N; Werner K; Offorjebe OA; Vecino-Ortiz AI; Wallis LA; Razzak J
  • PLoS One 2020[]; 15 (10): e0240503 PMID33035244show ga
  • BACKGROUND: In this paper, we predict the health and economic consequences of immediate investment in personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers (HCWs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: To account for health consequences, we estimated mortality for HCWs and present a cost-effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) analysis using a decision-analytic model with Bayesian multivariate sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. Data sources included inputs from the World Health Organization Essential Supplies Forecasting Tool and the Imperial College of London epidemiologic model. RESULTS: An investment of $9.6 billion USD would adequately protect HCWs in all LMICs. This intervention would save 2,299,543 lives across LMICs, costing $59 USD per HCW case averted and $4,309 USD per HCW life saved. The societal ROI would be $755.3 billion USD, the equivalent of a 7,932% return. Regional and national estimates are also presented. DISCUSSION: In scenarios where PPE remains scarce, 70-100% of HCWs will get infected, irrespective of nationwide social distancing policies. Maintaining HCW infection rates below 10% and mortality below 1% requires inclusion of a PPE scale-up strategy as part of the pandemic response. In conclusion, wide-scale procurement and distribution of PPE for LMICs is an essential strategy to prevent widespread HCW morbidity and mortality. It is cost-effective and yields a large downstream return on investment.
  • |*Cost-Benefit Analysis[MESH]
  • |Bayes Theorem[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/economics/epidemiology/*pathology/virology[MESH]
  • |Developing Countries[MESH]
  • |Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Health Workforce/*economics[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Monte Carlo Method[MESH]
  • |Pandemics/economics[MESH]
  • |Personal Protective Equipment/*economics/supply & distribution[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/economics/epidemiology/*pathology/virology[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box