Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003648 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003648 33033053!7545501!33033053     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMJ+Glob+Health 2020 ; 5 (10): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33033053|t=2020. The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index |pdf=|usr=}}{{33033053}} gab.com Text The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index JO: BMJ Glob Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33033053 #FOAvip Infectious disease outbreaks pose major threats to human health and security. Countries with robust capacities for preventing, detecting and responding to outbreaks can avert many of the social, political, economic and health system costs of such crises. The Global Health Security Index (GHS Index)-the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across 195 countries-recently found that no country is sufficiently prepared for epidemics or pandemics. The GHS Index can help health security stakeholders identify areas of weakness, as well as opportunities to collaborate across sectors, collectively strengthen health systems and achieve shared public health goals. Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index's approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality. Here, we (1) describe the practical value of the GHS Index; (2) present potential use cases to help policymakers and practitioners maximise the utility of the tool; (3) discuss the importance of scoring and ranking; (4) describe the robust methodology underpinning country scores and ranks; (5) highlight the GHS Index's emphasis on transparency and (6) articulate caveats for users wishing to use GHS Index data in health security research, policymaking and practice. Twit Text FOAVip The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index ????BMJ Glob Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33033053 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33033053 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33033053}}</ref> The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index #MMPMID33033053 Ravi SJ; Warmbrod KL; Mullen L; Meyer D; Cameron E; Bell J; Bapat P; Paterra M; Machalaba C; Nath I; Gostin LO; James W; George D; Nikkari S; Gozzer E; Tomori O; Makumbi I; Nuzzo JB BMJ Glob Health 2020[Oct]; 5 (10): ä PMID33033053show ga Infectious disease outbreaks pose major threats to human health and security. Countries with robust capacities for preventing, detecting and responding to outbreaks can avert many of the social, political, economic and health system costs of such crises. The Global Health Security Index (GHS Index)-the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across 195 countries-recently found that no country is sufficiently prepared for epidemics or pandemics. The GHS Index can help health security stakeholders identify areas of weakness, as well as opportunities to collaborate across sectors, collectively strengthen health systems and achieve shared public health goals. Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index's approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality. Here, we (1) describe the practical value of the GHS Index; (2) present potential use cases to help policymakers and practitioners maximise the utility of the tool; (3) discuss the importance of scoring and ranking; (4) describe the robust methodology underpinning country scores and ranks; (5) highlight the GHS Index's emphasis on transparency and (6) articulate caveats for users wishing to use GHS Index data in health security research, policymaking and practice. |*Global Health[MESH] |Benchmarking/organization & administration[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology/mortality/prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Leadership[MESH] |Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology/mortality/prevention & control[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing