Dangerous shortage of blood banks as an indirect effect of SARS-CoV-2: An obstetrics perspective #MMPMID33011971
Nieto-Calvache AJ; Quintero-Santacruz M; Macia-Mejia C; Lopez-Giron MC; Vergara-Galliadi LM; Ariza F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020[Dec]; 151 (3): 424-430 PMID33011971show ga
OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the frequency of blood donation (BD) in a Latin American hospital and how the social isolation policy implemented during the pandemic jeopardizes the quality of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) care due to shortages at blood banks (BB). METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted, lasting for 31 months, including the start of the pandemic. Frequency of BD and the use of obstetric emergency services was observed. RESULTS: A direct relationship was observed between the pandemic and a decrease in BD. Although emergency obstetric visits decreased, the frequency of deliveries and cases of PPH remained unchanged. After applying strategies to promote voluntary BD, a very slight increase was observed in the frequency of BD, with a negative indicator persisting between donation and blood demand. CONCLUSION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to shortages at BBs. In this context, typical measures to encourage an altruistic attitude toward BD have not had a significant impact. As causes of PPH continue, quality of care may be affected by the current situation at BBs. Governments and institutions must implement new strategies to motivate BD.
free
free
free
Int+J+Gynaecol+Obstet 2020 ; 151 (3): 424-430
