Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.046 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.046 33011103!7467022!33011103     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Surg+Educ 2021 ; 78 (3): 737-739 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33011103|t=2021. Adaptation to Open-Book Online Examination During the COVID-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33011103}} gab.com Text Adaptation to Open-Book Online Examination During the COVID-19 Pandemic JO: J Surg Educ http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33011103 #FOAvip INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 altered medical education systems worldwide as many medical schools quickly changed to online assessment systems. However, the feasibility of online assessment and how it compares to traditional examinations is unclear. METHODS: We compared 4(th) year medical students' online surgery clerkship assessment scores to the traditional written examinations. The percent of correct scores using online open-book examination was compared to the results of the traditional closed-book examination in the previous three rotations. Additional correlation between grade point average(GPA) and examination performance were reviewed. RESULTS: Compared with the traditional groups, medical students who took the online, open-book examination had a significantly higher mean score in both MCQ(85.21 vs. 77.36, 72.43, 83.00, p<0.001) and essay examinations (187.36 vs. 158.77, 152.17, 152.29, p<0.001), but a significantly lower mean score in short answer examination (60.09 vs. 66.79, 67.73, 64.82, p<0.001). The online open-book examination group had a significantly lower correlation between the essay score and their GPA than the previous traditional groups (z=2.81 p=0.005, z=2.23 p=0.026, z=2.19 p=0.029). CONCLUSION: Although an online, open-book examination was feasible during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study indicates that mean scores are significantly different which has important implications regarding grading and standard setting. More research is required to assess other effects of this new assessment on long-term knowledge retention and application. Twit Text FOAVip Adaptation to Open-Book Online Examination During the COVID-19 Pandemic ????J Surg Educ http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33011103 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33011103 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33011103}}</ref> Adaptation to Open-Book Online Examination During the COVID-19 Pandemic #MMPMID33011103 Eurboonyanun C; Wittayapairoch J; Aphinives P; Petrusa E; Gee DW; Phitayakorn R J Surg Educ 2021[May]; 78 (3): 737-739 PMID33011103show ga INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 altered medical education systems worldwide as many medical schools quickly changed to online assessment systems. However, the feasibility of online assessment and how it compares to traditional examinations is unclear. METHODS: We compared 4(th) year medical students' online surgery clerkship assessment scores to the traditional written examinations. The percent of correct scores using online open-book examination was compared to the results of the traditional closed-book examination in the previous three rotations. Additional correlation between grade point average(GPA) and examination performance were reviewed. RESULTS: Compared with the traditional groups, medical students who took the online, open-book examination had a significantly higher mean score in both MCQ(85.21 vs. 77.36, 72.43, 83.00, p<0.001) and essay examinations (187.36 vs. 158.77, 152.17, 152.29, p<0.001), but a significantly lower mean score in short answer examination (60.09 vs. 66.79, 67.73, 64.82, p<0.001). The online open-book examination group had a significantly lower correlation between the essay score and their GPA than the previous traditional groups (z=2.81 p=0.005, z=2.23 p=0.026, z=2.19 p=0.029). CONCLUSION: Although an online, open-book examination was feasible during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study indicates that mean scores are significantly different which has important implications regarding grading and standard setting. More research is required to assess other effects of this new assessment on long-term knowledge retention and application. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Clinical Clerkship[MESH] |*Education, Medical, Undergraduate[MESH] |*Students, Medical[MESH] |Educational Measurement[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH]Adaptation to Open-Book Online Examination During the COVID-19 Pandemi(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing