Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/aphw.12231 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/aphw.12231 33006814!7537318!33006814     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Appl+Psychol+Health+Well+Being 2020 ; 12 (4): 1244-1269 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33006814|t=2020. Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing Behavior During COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33006814}} gab.com Text Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing Behavior During COVID-19 JO: Appl Psychol Health Well Being http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33006814 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: This study examined the social cognition determinants of social distancing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in samples from Australia and the US guided by the health action process approach (HAPA). METHODS: Participants (Australia: N = 495, 50.1% women; US: N = 701, 48.9% women) completed HAPA social cognition constructs at an initial time-point (T1), and one week later (T2) self-reported their social distancing behavior. RESULTS: Single-indicator structural equation models that excluded and included past behavior exhibited adequate fit with the data. Intention and action control were significant predictors of social distancing behavior in both samples, and intention predicted action and coping planning in the US sample. Self-efficacy and action control were significant predictors of intention in both samples, with attitudes predicting intention in the Australia sample and risk perceptions predicting intention in the US sample. Significant indirect effects of social cognition constructs through intentions were observed. Inclusion of past behavior attenuated model effects. Multigroup analysis revealed no differences in model fit across samples, suggesting that observed variations in the parameter estimates were relatively trivial. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that social distancing is a function of motivational and volitional processes. This knowledge can be used to inform messaging regarding social distancing during COVID-19 and in future pandemics. Twit Text FOAVip Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing Behavior During COVID-19 ????Appl Psychol Health Well Being http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33006814 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33006814 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33006814}}</ref> Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing Behavior During COVID-19 #MMPMID33006814 Hamilton K; Smith SR; Keech JJ; Moyers SA; Hagger MS Appl Psychol Health Well Being 2020[Dec]; 12 (4): 1244-1269 PMID33006814show ga BACKGROUND: This study examined the social cognition determinants of social distancing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in samples from Australia and the US guided by the health action process approach (HAPA). METHODS: Participants (Australia: N = 495, 50.1% women; US: N = 701, 48.9% women) completed HAPA social cognition constructs at an initial time-point (T1), and one week later (T2) self-reported their social distancing behavior. RESULTS: Single-indicator structural equation models that excluded and included past behavior exhibited adequate fit with the data. Intention and action control were significant predictors of social distancing behavior in both samples, and intention predicted action and coping planning in the US sample. Self-efficacy and action control were significant predictors of intention in both samples, with attitudes predicting intention in the Australia sample and risk perceptions predicting intention in the US sample. Significant indirect effects of social cognition constructs through intentions were observed. Inclusion of past behavior attenuated model effects. Multigroup analysis revealed no differences in model fit across samples, suggesting that observed variations in the parameter estimates were relatively trivial. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that social distancing is a function of motivational and volitional processes. This knowledge can be used to inform messaging regarding social distancing during COVID-19 and in future pandemics. |*Adaptation, Psychological[MESH] |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Health Behavior[MESH] |*Models, Psychological[MESH] |*Physical Distancing[MESH] |*Self Efficacy[MESH] |*Social Cognition[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Australia[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Prospective Studies[MESH]Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing