Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1017/S096318012000078X http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1017/S096318012000078X 33004091!7711351!33004091     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Camb+Q+Healthc+Ethics 2021 ; 30 (2): 222-233 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33004091|t=2021. Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures |pdf=|usr=}}{{33004091}} gab.com Text Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures JO: Camb Q Healthc Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33004091 #FOAvip This paper presents a normative analysis of restrictive measures in response to a pandemic emergency. It applies to the context presented by the Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global outbreak of 2019, as well as to future pandemics. First, a Millian-liberal argument justifies lockdown measures in order to protect liberty under pandemic conditions, consistent with commonly accepted principles of public health ethics. Second, a wider argument contextualizes specific issues that attend acting on the justified lockdown for western liberal democratic states, as modeled on discourse and accounted for by Jurgen Habermas. The authors argue that a range of norms are constructed in societies that, justifiably, need to be curtailed for the pandemic. The state has to take on the unusual role of sole guardian of norms under emergency pandemic conditions. Consistently with both the Millian-liberal justification and elements of Habermasian discourse ethics, they argue that that role can only be justified where it includes strategy for how to return political decisionmaking to the status quo ante. This is because emergency conditions are only justified as a means to protecting prepandemic norms. To this end, the authors propose that an emergency power committee is necessary to guarantee that state action during pandemic is aimed at re-establishing the conditions of legitimacy of government action that ecological factors (a virus) have temporarily curtailed. Twit Text FOAVip Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures ????Camb Q Healthc Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33004091 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33004091 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33004091}}</ref> Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures #MMPMID33004091 Rainey S; Giubilini A Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2021[Apr]; 30 (2): 222-233 PMID33004091show ga This paper presents a normative analysis of restrictive measures in response to a pandemic emergency. It applies to the context presented by the Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global outbreak of 2019, as well as to future pandemics. First, a Millian-liberal argument justifies lockdown measures in order to protect liberty under pandemic conditions, consistent with commonly accepted principles of public health ethics. Second, a wider argument contextualizes specific issues that attend acting on the justified lockdown for western liberal democratic states, as modeled on discourse and accounted for by Jurgen Habermas. The authors argue that a range of norms are constructed in societies that, justifiably, need to be curtailed for the pandemic. The state has to take on the unusual role of sole guardian of norms under emergency pandemic conditions. Consistently with both the Millian-liberal justification and elements of Habermasian discourse ethics, they argue that that role can only be justified where it includes strategy for how to return political decisionmaking to the status quo ante. This is because emergency conditions are only justified as a means to protecting prepandemic norms. To this end, the authors propose that an emergency power committee is necessary to guarantee that state action during pandemic is aimed at re-establishing the conditions of legitimacy of government action that ecological factors (a virus) have temporarily curtailed. |Bioethical Issues/*legislation & jurisprudence[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH] |Ethical Theory[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics/legislation & jurisprudence/prevention & control[MESH]Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing