Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1111/coa.13652

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/coa.13652
suck pdf from google scholar
32997893!7646663!32997893
unlimited free pdf from europmc32997893    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32997893      Clin+Otolaryngol 2021 ; 46 (1): 229-233
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • A prospective multicentre external validation study of the Liverpool Peritonsillar abscess Score (LPS) with a no-examination COVID-19 modification #MMPMID32997893
  • Selwyn D; Yang D; Heward E; Kerai A; Thompson E; Shommakhi A; Faulkner S; Siau R; Walijee H; Hampton T; Chudek D; Singhera S; Din W; Lau AS
  • Clin Otolaryngol 2021[Jan]; 46 (1): 229-233 PMID32997893show ga
  • OBJECTIVES: Our primary aim was to validate the Liverpool Peritonsillar abscess Score (LPS) externally in a new patient cohort. Our secondary aim was to modify the LPS in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic to produce a no-examination variant for use in this instance. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre external validation study. SETTING: Six different secondary care institutions across the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Patients over 16 years old who were referred to ENT with any uncomplicated sore throat such a tonsillitis or peritonsillar abscess (PTA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for both the original LPS model and the modified model for COVID-19. RESULTS: The LPS model had sensitivity and specificity calculated at 98% and 79%, respectively. The LPS has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was slightly lower at 63%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, including the area under the curve (AUROC), was 0.888 which indicates very good accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: External validation of the LPS against an independent geographically diverse population yields high NPV. This may support non-specialist colleagues who may have concerns about mis-diagnosing a PTA. The COVID-19 modification of the LPS has a similar NPV, which may be of use where routine oral examination is to be avoided during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • |*Disease Management[MESH]
  • |*Pandemics[MESH]
  • |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Adolescent[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Aged, 80 and over[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Comorbidity[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Peritonsillar Abscess/*diagnosis/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Prospective Studies[MESH]
  • |ROC Curve[MESH]
  • |United Kingdom/epidemiology[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box