Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s41885-020-00077-w http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s41885-020-00077-w 32984755!7502807!32984755     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Econ+Disaster+Clim+Chang 2021 ; 5 (1): 71-95 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32984755|t=2021. COVID-19 with Stigma: Theory and Evidence from Mobility Data |pdf=|usr=}}{{32984755}} gab.com Text COVID-19 with Stigma: Theory and Evidence from Mobility Data JO: Econ Disaster Clim Chang http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32984755 #FOAvip This study conducts both theoretical and empirical analyses of how non-legally-binding COVID-19 policies affect people's going-out behavior. The theoretical analysis assumes that under a declared state of emergency, the individual going out suffers psychological costs arising from both the risk of infection and the stigma of going out. Our hypothesis states that under a declared state of emergency people refrain from going out because it entails a strong psychological cost. Then, this study estimates a model using regional mobility data and emergency declarations data to analyze self-restraint behavior under a non-legally binding emergency declaration. The results show that, compared with before the declaration of the state of emergency, going-out behavior was suppressed under the state of emergency and after it was lifted even when going out did not result in penalties, which is consistent with the theoretical analysis. Twit Text FOAVip COVID-19 with Stigma: Theory and Evidence from Mobility Data ????Econ Disaster Clim Chang http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32984755 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32984755 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32984755}}</ref> COVID-19 with Stigma: Theory and Evidence from Mobility Data #MMPMID32984755 Katafuchi Y; Kurita K; Managi S Econ Disaster Clim Chang 2021[]; 5 (1): 71-95 PMID32984755show ga This study conducts both theoretical and empirical analyses of how non-legally-binding COVID-19 policies affect people's going-out behavior. The theoretical analysis assumes that under a declared state of emergency, the individual going out suffers psychological costs arising from both the risk of infection and the stigma of going out. Our hypothesis states that under a declared state of emergency people refrain from going out because it entails a strong psychological cost. Then, this study estimates a model using regional mobility data and emergency declarations data to analyze self-restraint behavior under a non-legally binding emergency declaration. The results show that, compared with before the declaration of the state of emergency, going-out behavior was suppressed under the state of emergency and after it was lifted even when going out did not result in penalties, which is consistent with the theoretical analysis. äCOVID-19 with Stigma: Theory and Evidence from Mobility Data (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing