Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1093/ageing/afaa205

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/ageing/afaa205
suck pdf from google scholar
32975564!7543287!32975564
unlimited free pdf from europmc32975564    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32975564&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32975564      Age+Ageing 2021 ; 50 (1): 11-15
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • COVID 19: prioritise autonomy, beneficence and conversations before score-based triage #MMPMID32975564
  • Ho EP; Neo HY
  • Age Ageing 2021[Jan]; 50 (1): 11-15 PMID32975564show ga
  • At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, mounting demand overwhelmed critical care surge capacities, triggering implementation of triage protocols to determine ventilator allocation. Relying on triage scores to ration care, while relieving clinicians from making morally distressing decisions under high situational pressure, distracts clinicians from what is essentially deeply humanistic issues entrenched in this protracted public health crisis. Such an approach will become increasingly untenable as countries flatten their epidemic curves. Decisions regarding intensive care unit admission are particularly challenging in older people, who are most likely to require critical care, but for whom benefits are most uncertain. Before applying score-based triage, physicians must first discern if older people will benefit from critical care (beneficence) and second, if he wants critical care (autonomy). When deliberating beneficence, physicians should steer away from solely using age-stratified survival probabilities from epidemiological data. Instead, decisions must be based on individualised risk-stratification that encompasses evidence-based predictors of adverse outcomes specific to older adults. Survival will also need to be weighed against burden of treatment, as well as longer term functional deficits and quality-of-life. By identifying the robust older people who may benefit from critical care, clinicians should proceed to elicit his values and preferences that would determine the treatment most aligned with his best interest. During these dialogues, physicians must truthfully convey the emergent clinical reality, discern the older person's therapeutic goals and discuss the feasibility of achieving them. Given that COVID-19 is here to stay, these conversations aimed at achieving goal-cordant care must become a new clinical norm.
  • |*COVID-19/epidemiology/therapy[MESH]
  • |*Critical Care/ethics/psychology[MESH]
  • |*Functional Status[MESH]
  • |*Quality of Life[MESH]
  • |*Triage/ethics/methods[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Beneficence[MESH]
  • |Clinical Decision-Making/*ethics[MESH]
  • |Critical Pathways/*ethics[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Physician's Role/psychology[MESH]
  • |Prognosis[MESH]
  • |Risk Assessment[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box