Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1111/dth.14332

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/dth.14332
suck pdf from google scholar
32975345!7536931!32975345
unlimited free pdf from europmc32975345    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32975345&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32975345      Dermatol+Ther 2020 ; 33 (6): e14332
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • No SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in 25 patients with pseudo-chilblains #MMPMID32975345
  • Docampo-Simon A; Sanchez-Pujol MJ; Gimeno-Gascon A; Palazon-Cabanes JC; Juan-Carpena G; Vergara-De Caso E; Gonzalez-Villanueva I; Blanes-Martinez M; Betlloch-Mas I
  • Dermatol Ther 2020[Nov]; 33 (6): e14332 PMID32975345show ga
  • Chilblain-like acral lesions have been identified in some coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. It has been suggested that these pseudo-chilblains could be a specific marker of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Most patients with these lesions have had negative polymerase chain reactions (PCRs), but some authors believe serology tests are likely to give positive results. We designed a prospective study including all patients with pseudo-chilblains treated in outpatient department in April and May 2020 and then performed SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology tests on all available patients. We evaluated 59 patients, of whom 17 had undergone PCR before the study period, all with negative results. For the present study, we performed 20 additional PCRs, serology tests in 25 patients, and a parvovirus B19 antibody test in 15 patients. All results were negative. Our findings counter the hypothesis that serology is likely to reveal SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with pseudo-chilblains. One hypothesis for our negative results is that the time period between symptom onset and antibody production is longer in these patients; another is that the lesions are caused by behavioral changes during lockdown rather than SARS-CoV-2 infection. We nevertheless maintain that COVID-19 should be ruled out in people presenting with chilblain-like lesions.
  • |Adolescent[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Antibody Formation/*immunology[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Testing[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*complications/diagnosis/immunology[MESH]
  • |Chilblains/diagnosis/*etiology/immunology[MESH]
  • |Child[MESH]
  • |Child, Preschool[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Infant[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Polymerase Chain Reaction[MESH]
  • |Prospective Studies[MESH]
  • |Quarantine[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/*immunology[MESH]
  • |Time Factors[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box