Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1136/jech-2020-214453

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/jech-2020-214453
suck pdf from google scholar
32967892!ä!32967892

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid32967892      J+Epidemiol+Community+Health 2021 ; 75 (2): 189-192
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Psychological and behavioural responses to COVID-19: a China-Britain comparison #MMPMID32967892
  • Goodwin R; Hou WK; Sun S; Ben-Ezra M
  • J Epidemiol Community Health 2021[Feb]; 75 (2): 189-192 PMID32967892show ga
  • INTRODUCTION: Despite the burgeoning literature on COVID-19, there has been little cross-national work on the correlates of mental health or its association with pandemic behaviours. We considered psychological distress, quarantine status, social distancing and self-medication in China and the UK. METHODS: We conducted online surveys in China (N=1135) and the UK (N=1293), beginning in March 2020. Participants indicated demographics, whether they were in quarantine, relationship status, social distancing, use of vitamins/traditional medicines and completed the K6 scale of psychological distress. RESULTS: 19.1% of the respondents in China were at risk of severe mental illness (SMI: 95% CI 16.9% to 21.6%) and 16.6% (95% CI 14.6% to 18.8%) in the UK. Risk of SMI was among those in quarantine (OR 11.18 (95% CI 4.08 to 30.62); p=0.001) and in younger respondents (OR 2.61 (95% CI 1.01 to 6.79); p=0.048) although the latter effect was significant only in the UK. Risk of SMI was positively associated with self-medication (betas=0.17, p=0.001) and negatively with social distancing in China (countryxSMI beta=0.51, p=0.001), with further interactions for age and sex (social distancing), age, marital status and quarantine (self-medication). DISCUSSION: Across the countries, quarantine was associated with poorer mental health, while greater psychological distress was associated with greater self-medication rate. Future work should explore further cross-national variations in psychological health and behaviours during pandemics.
  • |*Psychological Distress[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/epidemiology/*psychology[MESH]
  • |China/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Mental Disorders/epidemiology/*etiology/psychology[MESH]
  • |Mental Health/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Physical Distancing[MESH]
  • |Quarantine/*psychology[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Self Medication[MESH]
  • |Stress, Psychological/epidemiology/*etiology/psychology[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box