Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1186/s13049-020-00789-8

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s13049-020-00789-8
suck pdf from google scholar
32962739!7506825!32962739
unlimited free pdf from europmc32962739    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32962739      Scand+J+Trauma+Resusc+Emerg+Med 2020 ; 28 (1): 94
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Pre-hospital care & interfacility transport of 385 COVID-19 emergency patients: an air ambulance perspective #MMPMID32962739
  • Hilbert-Carius P; Braun J; Abu-Zidan F; Adler J; Knapp J; Dandrifosse D; Braun D; Pietsch U; Adamczuk P; Rognas L; Albrecht R
  • Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020[Sep]; 28 (1): 94 PMID32962739show ga
  • BACKGROUND: COVID-19, the pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, is challenging healthcare systems worldwide. Little is known about problems faced by emergency medical services-particularly helicopter services-caring for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients. We aimed to describe the issues faced by air ambulance services in Europe as they transport potential COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Nine different HEMS providers in seven different countries across Europe were invited to share their experiences and to report their data regarding the care, transport, and safety measures in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 missions. Six air ambulance providers in six countries agreed and reported their data regarding development of special procedures and safety instructions in preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic. Four providers agreed to provide mission related data. Three hundred eighty-five COVID-19-related missions were analysed, including 119 primary transport missions and 266 interfacility transport missions. RESULTS: All providers had developed special procedures and safety instructions in preparation for COVID-19. Ground transport was the preferred mode of transport in primary missions, whereas air transport was preferred for interfacility transport. In some countries the transport of COVID-19 patients by regular air ambulance services was avoided. Patients in interfacility transport missions had a significantly higher median (range) NACA Score 4 (2-5) compared with 3 (1-7), needed significantly more medical interventions, were significantly younger (59.6 +/- 16 vs 65 +/- 21 years), and were significantly more often male (73% vs 60.5%). CONCLUSIONS: All participating air ambulance providers were prepared for COVID-19. Safe care and transport of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients is achievable. Most patients on primary missions were transported by ground. These patients were less sick than interfacility transport patients, for whom air transport was the preferred method.
  • |*Betacoronavirus[MESH]
  • |*Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Air Ambulances/*organization & administration[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Emergency Service, Hospital/*organization & administration[MESH]
  • |Europe/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box