Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1177/2192568220960423 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/2192568220960423 32959711!8351063!32959711     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32959711&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Global+Spine+J 2021 ; 11 (7): 1142-1147 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32959711|t=2021. Physical Examination of the Spine Using Telemedicine: A Systematic Review |pdf=|usr=}}{{32959711}} gab.com Text Physical Examination of the Spine Using Telemedicine: A Systematic Review JO: Global Spine J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32959711 #FOAvip STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review (1) the reliability of the physical examination of the spine using telehealth as it pertains to spinal pathology and (2) patient satisfaction with the virtual spine physical examination. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Medline Ovid, and SCOPUS databases from inception until April 2020. Eligible studies included those that reported on performing a virtual spine physical examination. Two reviewers independently assessed all potential studies for eligibility and extracted data. The primary outcome of interest was the reliability of the virtual spine physical exam. Secondary outcomes of interest were patient satisfaction with the virtual encounter. RESULTS: A total of 2321 studies were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, 3 studies (88 patients) were included that compared virtual with in-person spine physical examinations. These studies showed acceptable reliability for portions of the low back virtual exam. Patient satisfaction surveys were conducted in 2 of the studies and showed general satisfaction (>80% would recommend). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the virtual spine examination may be comparable to the in-person physical examination for low back pain, though there is a significant void in the literature regarding the reliability of the physical examination as it pertains to specific surgical pathology of the spine. Because patients are overall satisfied with virtual spine assessments, validating a virtual physical examination of the spine is an important area that requires further research. Twit Text FOAVip Physical Examination of the Spine Using Telemedicine: A Systematic Review ????Global Spine J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32959711 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32959711 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32959711}}</ref> Physical Examination of the Spine Using Telemedicine: A Systematic Review #MMPMID32959711 Piche J; Butt BB; Ahmady A; Patel R; Aleem I Global Spine J 2021[Sep]; 11 (7): 1142-1147 PMID32959711show ga STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review (1) the reliability of the physical examination of the spine using telehealth as it pertains to spinal pathology and (2) patient satisfaction with the virtual spine physical examination. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Medline Ovid, and SCOPUS databases from inception until April 2020. Eligible studies included those that reported on performing a virtual spine physical examination. Two reviewers independently assessed all potential studies for eligibility and extracted data. The primary outcome of interest was the reliability of the virtual spine physical exam. Secondary outcomes of interest were patient satisfaction with the virtual encounter. RESULTS: A total of 2321 studies were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, 3 studies (88 patients) were included that compared virtual with in-person spine physical examinations. These studies showed acceptable reliability for portions of the low back virtual exam. Patient satisfaction surveys were conducted in 2 of the studies and showed general satisfaction (>80% would recommend). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the virtual spine examination may be comparable to the in-person physical examination for low back pain, though there is a significant void in the literature regarding the reliability of the physical examination as it pertains to specific surgical pathology of the spine. Because patients are overall satisfied with virtual spine assessments, validating a virtual physical examination of the spine is an important area that requires further research. ?Physical Examination of the Spine Using Telemedicine: A Systematic Rev(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing