Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32953169&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215
Comparison of Anterior Ocular Biometric Measurements Using Swept-Source and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography #MMPMID32953169
Chen S; Gao R; McAlinden C; Ye J; Wang Y; Chen M; Huang J; Sun Y; Yu AY
J Ophthalmol 2020[]; 2020 (?): 9739878 PMID32953169show ga
PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements using the swept-source (CASIA SS-1000, Tomey, Japan) and time-domain (Visante, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) anterior segment optical coherence tomographers (OCT) in normal eyes. METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes of 68 subjects were included. Three consecutive scans of each subject were obtained using both devices in a random order by one experienced operator. Standard deviation (S (w)), coefficient of repeatability (CoR), coefficients of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate the intraoperator repeatability. Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: All measurements of the swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) showed high repeatability with low CoR (CCT: 2.34 mum and 6.16 mum; AQD: 0.05 mm and 0.09 mm; ACD: 0.06 mm and 0.09 mm), low CoV (CCT: 0.16% and 0.42%; AQD: 0.61% and 0.97%; ACD: 0.53% and 0.83%), and high ICC (>0.98). The mean CCT with SS-OCT was slightly thicker than the results with TD-OCT (difference = 4.55 +/- 2.62 mum, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in AQD or ACD measurements between the two devices (0.01 +/- 0.05 mm, P=0.111; 0.02 +/- 0.05 mm, P=0.022, respectively). The 95% LoA between the SS-OCT and TD-OCT were -0.59 to 9.69 mum for CCT, -0.10 to 0.12 mm for AQD, and -0.09 to 0.12 mm for ACD. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of repeatability and agreement were found between the two devices for all three parameters, suggesting interchangeability. SS-OCT demonstrated superior repeatability compared with TD-OCT.