Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.22462/01.03.2020.1

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.22462/01.03.2020.1
suck pdf from google scholar
32931666!?!32931666

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32931666&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32931666      Undersea+Hyperb+Med 2020 ; 47 (3): 405-413
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for COVID-19 patients with respiratory distress: treated cases versus propensity-matched controls #MMPMID32931666
  • Gorenstein SA; Castellano ML; Slone ES; Gillette B; Liu H; Alsamarraie C; Jacobson AM; Wall SP; Adhikari S; Swartz JL; McMullen JJS; Osorio M; Koziatek CA; Lee DC
  • Undersea Hyperb Med 2020[Thi]; 47 (3): 405-413 PMID32931666show ga
  • OBJECTIVE: Given the high mortality and prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation of COVID-19 patients, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen for COVID-19 patients with respiratory distress. METHODS: This is a single-center clinical trial of COVID-19 patients at NYU Winthrop Hospital from March 31 to April 28, 2020. Patients in this trial received hyperbaric oxygen therapy at 2.0 atmospheres of pressure in monoplace hyperbaric chambers for 90 minutes daily for a maximum of five total treatments. Controls were identified using propensity score matching among COVID-19 patients admitted during the same time period. Using competing-risks survival regression, we analyzed our primary outcome of inpatient mortality and secondary outcome of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: We treated 20 COVID-19 patients with hyperbaric oxygen. Ages ranged from 30 to 79 years with an oxygen requirement ranging from 2 to 15 liters on hospital days 0 to 14. Of these 20 patients, two (10%) were intubated and died, and none remain hospitalized. Among 60 propensity-matched controls based on age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, troponin, D-dimer, hospital day, and oxygen requirement, 18 (30%) were intubated, 13 (22%) have died, and three (5%) remain hospitalized (with one still requiring mechanical ventilation). Assuming no further deaths among controls, we estimate that the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios were 0.37 for inpatient mortality (p=0.14) and 0.26 for mechanical ventilation (p=0.046). CONCLUSION: Though limited by its study design, our results demonstrate the safety of hyperbaric oxygen among COVID-19 patients and strongly suggests the need for a well-designed, multicenter randomized control trial.
  • |*Betacoronavirus[MESH]
  • |*Propensity Score[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Atmospheric Pressure[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Case-Control Studies[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/complications/mortality/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Hyperbaric Oxygenation/adverse effects/*methods[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/complications/mortality/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Respiration, Artificial/mortality[MESH]
  • |Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology/mortality/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Risk Factors[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Safety[MESH]
  • |Survival Analysis[MESH]
  • |Time Factors[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box