Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1371/journal.pone.0238906 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0238906 32915878!7485771!32915878     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       PLoS+One 2020 ; 15 (9): e0238906 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32915878|t=2020. Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown |pdf=|usr=}}{{32915878}} gab.com Text Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown JO: PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32915878 #FOAvip Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-sectional online survey was launched four weeks after lockdown measures were implemented in Austria. Relationship quality was measured with the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and mental health measures included quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF psychological domain), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests and Chisquared tests were applied. In all mental health scales, individuals with good relationship quality (n = 543) scored better than individuals with poor relationship quality (n = 190) or without relationship (n = 272). The odds ratios (OR) between the poor and good relationship quality groups were 3.5 for the PHQ-9, 3.4 for the GAD-7, and 2.0 for the ISI. Additionally, individuals without no relationship scored better on all scales than individuals with poor relationship quality (all p-values < .05). Relationship quality was related to mental health during COVID-19. The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased according to relationship quality from 13% up to 35%. Relationship per se was not associated with better mental health, but the quality of the relationship was essential. Compared to no relationship, a good relationship quality was a protective factor whereas a poor relationship quality was a risk factor. Twit Text FOAVip Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown ????PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32915878 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32915878 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32915878}}</ref> Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown #MMPMID32915878 Pieh C; O Rourke T; Budimir S; Probst T PLoS One 2020[]; 15 (9): e0238906 PMID32915878show ga Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-sectional online survey was launched four weeks after lockdown measures were implemented in Austria. Relationship quality was measured with the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and mental health measures included quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF psychological domain), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests and Chisquared tests were applied. In all mental health scales, individuals with good relationship quality (n = 543) scored better than individuals with poor relationship quality (n = 190) or without relationship (n = 272). The odds ratios (OR) between the poor and good relationship quality groups were 3.5 for the PHQ-9, 3.4 for the GAD-7, and 2.0 for the ISI. Additionally, individuals without no relationship scored better on all scales than individuals with poor relationship quality (all p-values < .05). Relationship quality was related to mental health during COVID-19. The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased according to relationship quality from 13% up to 35%. Relationship per se was not associated with better mental health, but the quality of the relationship was essential. Compared to no relationship, a good relationship quality was a protective factor whereas a poor relationship quality was a risk factor. |*Family Relations[MESH] |*Interpersonal Relations[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Austria[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology/prevention & control/*psychology[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Mental Health/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology/prevention & control/*psychology[MESH] |Quarantine/*psychology[MESH] |Social Isolation[MESH]Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing