Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.08.033 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.08.033 32893040!7470714!32893040     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ann+Emerg+Med 2021 ; 77 (1): 1-10 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32893040|t=2021. Improved Testing and Design of Intubation Boxes During the COVID-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{32893040}} gab.com Text Improved Testing and Design of Intubation Boxes During the COVID-19 Pandemic JO: Ann Emerg Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32893040 #FOAvip STUDY OBJECTIVE: Throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, many emergency departments have been using passive protective enclosures ("intubation boxes") during intubation. The effectiveness of these enclosures remains uncertain. We sought to quantify their ability to contain aerosols using industry standard test protocols. METHODS: We tested a commercially available passive protective enclosure representing the most common design and compared this with a modified enclosure that incorporated a vacuum system for active air filtration during simulated intubations and negative-pressure isolation. We evaluated the enclosures by using the same 3 tests air filtration experts use to certify class I biosafety cabinets: visual smoke pattern analysis using neutrally buoyant smoke, aerosol leak testing using a test aerosol that mimics the size of virus-containing particulates, and air velocity measurements. RESULTS: Qualitative evaluation revealed smoke escaping from all passive enclosure openings. Aerosol leak testing demonstrated elevated particle concentrations outside the enclosure during simulated intubations. In contrast, vacuum-filter-equipped enclosures fully contained the visible smoke and test aerosol to standards consistent with class I biosafety cabinet certification. CONCLUSION: Passive enclosures for intubation failed to contain aerosols, but the addition of a vacuum and active air filtration reduced aerosol spread during simulated intubation and patient isolation. Twit Text FOAVip Improved Testing and Design of Intubation Boxes During the COVID-19 Pandemic ????Ann Emerg Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32893040 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32893040 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32893040}}</ref> Improved Testing and Design of Intubation Boxes During the COVID-19 Pandemic #MMPMID32893040 Turer DM; Good CH; Schilling BK; Turer RW; Karlowsky NR; Dvoracek LA; Ban H; Chang JS; Rubin JP Ann Emerg Med 2021[Jan]; 77 (1): 1-10 PMID32893040show ga STUDY OBJECTIVE: Throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, many emergency departments have been using passive protective enclosures ("intubation boxes") during intubation. The effectiveness of these enclosures remains uncertain. We sought to quantify their ability to contain aerosols using industry standard test protocols. METHODS: We tested a commercially available passive protective enclosure representing the most common design and compared this with a modified enclosure that incorporated a vacuum system for active air filtration during simulated intubations and negative-pressure isolation. We evaluated the enclosures by using the same 3 tests air filtration experts use to certify class I biosafety cabinets: visual smoke pattern analysis using neutrally buoyant smoke, aerosol leak testing using a test aerosol that mimics the size of virus-containing particulates, and air velocity measurements. RESULTS: Qualitative evaluation revealed smoke escaping from all passive enclosure openings. Aerosol leak testing demonstrated elevated particle concentrations outside the enclosure during simulated intubations. In contrast, vacuum-filter-equipped enclosures fully contained the visible smoke and test aerosol to standards consistent with class I biosafety cabinet certification. CONCLUSION: Passive enclosures for intubation failed to contain aerosols, but the addition of a vacuum and active air filtration reduced aerosol spread during simulated intubation and patient isolation. |Aerosols[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control/transmission[MESH] |Cross Infection/prevention & control[MESH] |Equipment Design[MESH] |Filtration/instrumentation[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infection Control/*instrumentation[MESH] |Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control[MESH] |Intubation, Intratracheal/*instrumentation[MESH] |Manikins[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*prevention & control/transmission/virology[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Improved Testing and Design of Intubation Boxes During the COVID-19 Pa(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing