Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001141

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001141
suck pdf from google scholar
32885267!8055096!32885267
unlimited free pdf from europmc32885267    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32885267&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32885267      South+Med+J 2020 ; 113 (9): 462-465
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • US Dermatology Resident Responses about the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from a Nationwide Survey #MMPMID32885267
  • Li YM; Galimberti F; Abrouk M; Kirsner RS
  • South Med J 2020[Sep]; 113 (9): 462-465 PMID32885267show ga
  • OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically changed resident training in the United States. Here, we explore the early perceived effects of COVID-19 on dermatology residents through an electronic sample survey and identify possible areas for targeted improvement in lieu of a possible second wave of COVID-19 cases. METHODS: On April 3, 2020, a survey of link with 25 questions was sent to dermatology program coordinators to be disseminated among dermatology residents in the United States. The survey was closed on April 13, 2020. All of the questions were optional and no personal identifiers were collected. RESULTS: A total of 140 dermatology residents from 50 different residency programs across 26 states responded to the survey. The majority of respondents (85%) reported negative effects of COVID-19 on their overall wellness. Despite the majority of residents (92%) speculating that COVID-19 will have negative long-term effects on the US economy, only 33% agreed or strongly agreed that it will affect their job prospects. Teledermatology was widely implemented following the declaration of a national emergency (96% of represented residencies compared with only 30% before the pandemic), with heavy resident involvement. The majority of residents (99%) reported having virtual didactics and that they found them to be beneficial. Most residents were uncomfortable with the prospect of being reassigned to a nondermatology specialty during the pandemic. In addition, 22% of residents believed that their leadership were not transparent and prompt in addressing changes relating to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatology residents were affected negatively by COVID-19 in regard to their well-being, clinical training, and education. Several areas of improvement were identified that could improve our preparedness for a second wave of the virus.
  • |*Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |*Dermatology/education/methods[MESH]
  • |*Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |*Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |*Telemedicine/methods/trends[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Education/methods[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Organizational Innovation[MESH]
  • |Patient Care Management/organization & administration/*trends[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Skin Diseases/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Social Perception[MESH]
  • |Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box