Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/jmv.26477 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/jmv.26477 32880994!ä!32880994 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Med+Virol 2021 ; 93 (6): 3955-3959 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32880994|t=2021. Common respiratory viral infections: Bilateral versus unilateral bronchoalveolar lavage versus endotracheal aspiration |pdf=|usr=}}{{32880994}} gab.com Text Common respiratory viral infections: Bilateral versus unilateral bronchoalveolar lavage versus endotracheal aspiration JO: J Med Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880994 #FOAvip Data about the diagnostic efficiency of bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples and endotracheal aspirates (EA) testing for common viral respiratory infections are scarce. We analyzed data from 167 cases, where bilateral BAL samples were tested, and from 101 cases, where BAL samples and EA were tested. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with the fast track diagnostics viral respiratory panel, producing data on the adenovirus, coronavirus, enterovirus, human metapneumovirus, bocavirus, influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus status of patients with respiratory disease symptoms. In the bilateral BAL cohort, 46 (27.5%) cases were positive for at least one of the viruses mentioned above in both samples. Discrepant results (virus not detected on one side) were seen in six (3.6%) cases. In the BAL versus EA cohort, 12 (11.9%) cases were positive in both materials, discrepant results (only one material being positive) were observed in 11 (10.9%) cases, with seven (63.6%) BAL samples, and four (36.4%) EA being positive. Bilateral sampling does not significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency of BAL for the detection of common respiratory viral pathogens via PCR. The diagnostic quality of EA and BAL samples for the detection of common viral respiratory pathogens is comparable. Twit Text FOAVip Common respiratory viral infections: Bilateral versus unilateral bronchoalveolar lavage versus endotracheal aspiration ????J Med Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880994 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880994 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32880994}}</ref> Common respiratory viral infections: Bilateral versus unilateral bronchoalveolar lavage versus endotracheal aspiration #MMPMID32880994 Anastasiou OE; Theodoropoulos F; Taube C; Fiedler M; Dittmer U J Med Virol 2021[Jun]; 93 (6): 3955-3959 PMID32880994show ga Data about the diagnostic efficiency of bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples and endotracheal aspirates (EA) testing for common viral respiratory infections are scarce. We analyzed data from 167 cases, where bilateral BAL samples were tested, and from 101 cases, where BAL samples and EA were tested. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with the fast track diagnostics viral respiratory panel, producing data on the adenovirus, coronavirus, enterovirus, human metapneumovirus, bocavirus, influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus status of patients with respiratory disease symptoms. In the bilateral BAL cohort, 46 (27.5%) cases were positive for at least one of the viruses mentioned above in both samples. Discrepant results (virus not detected on one side) were seen in six (3.6%) cases. In the BAL versus EA cohort, 12 (11.9%) cases were positive in both materials, discrepant results (only one material being positive) were observed in 11 (10.9%) cases, with seven (63.6%) BAL samples, and four (36.4%) EA being positive. Bilateral sampling does not significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency of BAL for the detection of common respiratory viral pathogens via PCR. The diagnostic quality of EA and BAL samples for the detection of common viral respiratory pathogens is comparable. |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Bronchoalveolar Lavage/*methods[MESH] |Cohort Studies[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis/virology[MESH] |Coronavirus/isolation & purification[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods[MESH] |Respiratory Tract Infections/*diagnosis/*virology[MESH]Common respiratory viral infections: Bilateral versus unilateral bronc(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing