Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7196/SAMJ.2020v110i6.14840 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7196/SAMJ.2020v110i6.14840 32880549!?!32880549 Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32880549&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       S+Afr+Med+J 2020 ; 110 (6): 453-455 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32880549|t=2020. COVID-19: Mandatory institutional isolation v voluntary home self-isolation |pdf=|usr=}}{{32880549}} gab.com Text COVID-19: Mandatory institutional isolation v voluntary home self-isolation JO: S Afr Med J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880549 #FOAvip Since community transmission of COVID-19 became established in South Africa, individuals who test positive for COVID-19 and who do not require hospitalisation have been permitted to self-isolate in their homes to reduce the burden on the health system. The Premier of KwaZulu-Natal Province has since announced that self-isolation will no longer be permitted in the province. Instead, mandatory isolation in state-designated isolation sites would apply. This policy change marks a dangerous departure from the country's prevailing position on home-based self-isolation and should not be replicated elsewhere. Twit Text FOAVip COVID-19: Mandatory institutional isolation v voluntary home self-isolation ????S Afr Med J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880549 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880549 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32880549}}</ref> COVID-19: Mandatory institutional isolation v voluntary home self-isolation #MMPMID32880549 Singh JA S Afr Med J 2020[Apr]; 110 (6): 453-455 PMID32880549show ga Since community transmission of COVID-19 became established in South Africa, individuals who test positive for COVID-19 and who do not require hospitalisation have been permitted to self-isolate in their homes to reduce the burden on the health system. The Premier of KwaZulu-Natal Province has since announced that self-isolation will no longer be permitted in the province. Instead, mandatory isolation in state-designated isolation sites would apply. This policy change marks a dangerous departure from the country's prevailing position on home-based self-isolation and should not be replicated elsewhere. |*Health Policy[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics/*prevention & control[MESH] |Patient Isolation/*legislation & jurisprudence[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Quarantine/*legislation & jurisprudence[MESH]COVID-19: Mandatory institutional isolation v voluntary home self-iso(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing