Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/ 32880404!ä!32880404 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Law+Med 2020 ; 27 (4): 856-864 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32880404|t=2020. Legal Implications of Personal Protective Equipment Use When Treating Patients for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) |pdf=|usr=}}{{32880404}} gab.com Text Legal Implications of Personal Protective Equipment Use When Treating Patients for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) JO: J Law Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880404 #FOAvip Front-line health care personnel, including anaesthetists, otolaryngologists, and other health professionals dealing with acute cases of coronavirus, face a high risk of infection and thus mortality. The scientific evidence establishes that to protect them, hospital protocols should require that wearing of the highest levels of personal protective equipment (PPE) be available for doctors and nurses performing aerosol-generating procedures, such as intubation, sputum induction, open suctioning of airways, bronchoscopy, etc. of COVID-19 patients. Although several international bodies have issued recommendations for a very high-level PPE to be used when these procedures are undertaken, the current PPE guidelines in Australia have tended to be more relaxed, and hospital authorities relying on them might not comply with legal obligations to their employee health care workers. Failure to provide high-level PPE in many hospitals is of concern for a large number of health care workers; this article examines the scientific literature on the topic and provides a legal perspective on hospital authorities' possible liability in negligence. Twit Text FOAVip Legal Implications of Personal Protective Equipment Use When Treating Patients for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) ????J Law Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880404 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32880404 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32880404}}</ref> Legal Implications of Personal Protective Equipment Use When Treating Patients for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) #MMPMID32880404 Mendelson D; Keane M; Bagaric M; Graydon C J Law Med 2020[Aug]; 27 (4): 856-864 PMID32880404show ga Front-line health care personnel, including anaesthetists, otolaryngologists, and other health professionals dealing with acute cases of coronavirus, face a high risk of infection and thus mortality. The scientific evidence establishes that to protect them, hospital protocols should require that wearing of the highest levels of personal protective equipment (PPE) be available for doctors and nurses performing aerosol-generating procedures, such as intubation, sputum induction, open suctioning of airways, bronchoscopy, etc. of COVID-19 patients. Although several international bodies have issued recommendations for a very high-level PPE to be used when these procedures are undertaken, the current PPE guidelines in Australia have tended to be more relaxed, and hospital authorities relying on them might not comply with legal obligations to their employee health care workers. Failure to provide high-level PPE in many hospitals is of concern for a large number of health care workers; this article examines the scientific literature on the topic and provides a legal perspective on hospital authorities' possible liability in negligence. |*Coronavirus Infections[MESH] |*Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Personal Protective Equipment[MESH] |*Pneumonia, Viral[MESH] |Australia[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Legal Implications of Personal Protective Equipment Use When Treating (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing