Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.clcc.2020.07.006

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.clcc.2020.07.006
suck pdf from google scholar
32868231!7391078!32868231
unlimited free pdf from europmc32868231    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32868231      Clin+Colorectal+Cancer 2021 ; 20 (1): e5-e11
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Screening Program #MMPMID32868231
  • D'Ovidio V; Lucidi C; Bruno G; Lisi D; Miglioresi L; Bazuro ME
  • Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021[Mar]; 20 (1): e5-e11 PMID32868231show ga
  • INTRODUCTION: One of the main clusters of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been identified in Italy. Following European and local guidelines, Italian endoscopy units modulated their activity. We aimed at analyzing the need and safety to continue selective colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective controlled cohort study in our "COVID-free" hospital to compare data of the CRCS colonoscopies of the lockdown period (March 9 to May 4, 2020) with those of the same period of 2019 (control group). A pre/post endoscopic sanitary surveillance for COVID-19 infection was organized for patients and sanitary staff. RESULTS: In the lockdown group, 60 of 137 invited patients underwent endoscopy, whereas in the control group, 238 CRCS colonoscopies (3.9-fold) were performed. In the lower number of examinations during the lockdown, we found more colorectal cancers (5 cases; 8% vs. 3 cases; 1%; P = .002). The "high-risk" adenomas detection rate was also significantly higher in the "lockdown group" than in controls (47% vs. 25%; P = .001). A multiple regression analysis selected relevant symptoms (hazard ratio [HR], 3.1), familiarity (HR, 1.99), and lockdown period (HR, 2.2) as independent predictors of high-risk lesions (high-risk adenomas and colorectal cancer). No COVID-19 infections were reported among staff and patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adherence to CRCS decreased during the pandemic, but the continuation of CRCS colonoscopies was efficacious and safe.
  • |*Colonoscopy[MESH]
  • |*Early Detection of Cancer[MESH]
  • |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Colorectal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Patient Safety[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box