Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200409-00540

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200409-00540
suck pdf from google scholar
32867427!ä!32867427

suck abstract from ncbi


Warning: Undefined variable $yww in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 538

Warning: Undefined variable $yww in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 538
pmid32867427      Zhonghua+Liu+Xing+Bing+Xue+Za+Zhi 2020 ; 41 (8): 1220-1224
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 monitoring cases in Yinzhou district based on health big data platform #MMPMID32867427
  • Sun YX; Shen P; Zhang JY; Lu P; Chai PF; Mou H; Huang WZ; Lin HB; Shui LM
  • Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2020[Aug]; 41 (8): 1220-1224 PMID32867427show ga
  • Objective: To understand the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 monitoring cases in Yinzhou district based on health big data platform to provide evidence for the construction of COVID-19 monitoring system. Methods: Data on Yinzhou COVID-19 daily surveillance were collected. Information on patients' population classification, epidemiological history, COVID-19 nucleic acid detection rate, positive detection rate and confirmed cases monitoring detection rate were analyzed. Results: Among the 1 595 COVID-19 monitoring cases, 79.94% were community population and 20.06% were key population. The verification rate of monitoring cases was 100.00%. The total percentage of epidemiological history related to Wuhan city or Hubei province was 6.27% in total, and was 2.12% in community population and 22.81% in key population (P<0.001). The total COVID-19 nucleic acid detection rate was 18.24% (291/1 595), and 53.00% in those with epidemiological history and 15.92% in those without (P<0.001).The total positive detection rate was 1.72% (5/291) and the confirmed cases monitoring detection rate was 0.31% (5/1 595). The time interval from the first visit to the first nucleic acid detection of the confirmed monitoring cases and other confirmed cases was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). Conclusions: The monitoring system of COVID-19 based on the health big data platform was working well but the confirmed cases monitoring detection rate need to be improved.
  • |*Betacoronavirus/genetics/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Big Data[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |China/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Cities[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Disease Outbreaks[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Population Surveillance[MESH]
  • |RNA, Viral/genetics/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box