Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/geronb/gbaa119 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/geronb/gbaa119 32789476!7566965!32789476     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Gerontol+B+Psychol+Sci+Soc+Sci 2020 ; 75 (9): 2018-2028 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32789476|t=2020. Robotic Pet Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults |pdf=|usr=}}{{32789476}} gab.com Text Robotic Pet Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults JO: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32789476 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of robotic pets in alleviating loneliness for older adults. METHOD: Self-reported lonely individuals with AARP Medicare Supplement plans insured by UnitedHealthcare who participated in a program with a robotic pet (n = 20) were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to provide feedback about their experiences interacting with a robotic pet, their perceptions about the potential impact on loneliness, and recommendations for improving the program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants' responses were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Constant comparison and consensus-gaining processes were used to develop categories that later formed representative themes. RESULTS: Seven themes emerged from analysis: Openness to Adoption of Robotic Pet, Reactions to Pet and its Attributes, Integration of Pet in Daily Life, Strategic Utilization and Forging New Connections, Deriving Comfort and Camaraderie, Advice for Future Users, and Recommendations for Enhancing Ownership Experience. Participants living alone, with fewer social connections and less active lifestyles, derived the most benefit from interacting with their pets. Common responses to pets included cuddling, petting, grooming, and sleeping with them. Some shared or loaned their pets, while others refused to loan their pets to interested peers. Most reported showing their pets to others, which helped some facilitate communication and social connections. CONCLUSION: Robotic pets may be an effective solution for alleviating loneliness in older adults, especially among those who live alone, have fewer social connections, and live less active lifestyles. Twit Text FOAVip Robotic Pet Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults ????J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32789476 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32789476 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32789476}}</ref> Robotic Pet Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults #MMPMID32789476 Hudson J; Ungar R; Albright L; Tkatch R; Schaeffer J; Wicker ER J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2020[Oct]; 75 (9): 2018-2028 PMID32789476show ga OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of robotic pets in alleviating loneliness for older adults. METHOD: Self-reported lonely individuals with AARP Medicare Supplement plans insured by UnitedHealthcare who participated in a program with a robotic pet (n = 20) were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to provide feedback about their experiences interacting with a robotic pet, their perceptions about the potential impact on loneliness, and recommendations for improving the program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants' responses were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Constant comparison and consensus-gaining processes were used to develop categories that later formed representative themes. RESULTS: Seven themes emerged from analysis: Openness to Adoption of Robotic Pet, Reactions to Pet and its Attributes, Integration of Pet in Daily Life, Strategic Utilization and Forging New Connections, Deriving Comfort and Camaraderie, Advice for Future Users, and Recommendations for Enhancing Ownership Experience. Participants living alone, with fewer social connections and less active lifestyles, derived the most benefit from interacting with their pets. Common responses to pets included cuddling, petting, grooming, and sleeping with them. Some shared or loaned their pets, while others refused to loan their pets to interested peers. Most reported showing their pets to others, which helped some facilitate communication and social connections. CONCLUSION: Robotic pets may be an effective solution for alleviating loneliness in older adults, especially among those who live alone, have fewer social connections, and live less active lifestyles. |*Object Attachment[MESH] |*Robotics[MESH] |Activities of Daily Living/*psychology[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Animals[MESH] |Efficiency, Organizational[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Independent Living/*psychology[MESH] |Loneliness/*psychology[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Peer Group[MESH] |Pets/*psychology[MESH] |Program Development[MESH] |Qualitative Research[MESH] |Social Interaction[MESH]Robotic Pet Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing