Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1037/amp0000717 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1037/amp0000717 32772540!ä!32772540 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Am+Psychol 2021 ; 76 (5): 744-754 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32772540|t=2021. Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines |pdf=|usr=}}{{32772540}} gab.com Text Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines JO: Am Psychol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32772540 #FOAvip During the current COVID-19 pandemic, religious gatherings have become intense hot spots for the spread of the virus. In this research, we focus on the religiosity of communities to examine whether religiosity helps or hinders adherence to mitigation policies such as shelter-in-place directives. Prior research has made opposing predictions as to the influence of religiosity. One stream predicts greater adherence because of rule-abiding norms and altruistic tendencies, whereas another has predicted lower adherence as a reaction against the restriction of personal and religious freedom. We used shelter-in-place directives as an intervention in a quasiexperiment to examine adherence over 30 days as a function of religiosity in the most populous metropolitan areas in the United States. When a shelter-in-place directive had not been imposed, religiosity did not affect people's movements. However, when the directive was imposed, higher religiosity resulted in less adherence to shelter-in-place directives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved). Twit Text FOAVip Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines ????Am Psychol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32772540 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32772540 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32772540}}</ref> Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines #MMPMID32772540 DeFranza D; Lindow M; Harrison K; Mishra A; Mishra H Am Psychol 2021[Jul]; 76 (5): 744-754 PMID32772540show ga During the current COVID-19 pandemic, religious gatherings have become intense hot spots for the spread of the virus. In this research, we focus on the religiosity of communities to examine whether religiosity helps or hinders adherence to mitigation policies such as shelter-in-place directives. Prior research has made opposing predictions as to the influence of religiosity. One stream predicts greater adherence because of rule-abiding norms and altruistic tendencies, whereas another has predicted lower adherence as a reaction against the restriction of personal and religious freedom. We used shelter-in-place directives as an intervention in a quasiexperiment to examine adherence over 30 days as a function of religiosity in the most populous metropolitan areas in the United States. When a shelter-in-place directive had not been imposed, religiosity did not affect people's movements. However, when the directive was imposed, higher religiosity resulted in less adherence to shelter-in-place directives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved). |*COVID-19[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Religion[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing