Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.2215/CJN.03800320

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.2215/CJN.03800320
suck pdf from google scholar
32680914!8011003!32680914
unlimited free pdf from europmc32680914    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid32680914      Clin+J+Am+Soc+Nephrol 2021 ; 16 (3): 479-486
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Preprint Servers in Kidney Disease Research: A Rapid Review #MMPMID32680914
  • Vlasschaert C; Giles C; Hiremath S; Lanktree MB
  • Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021[Mar]; 16 (3): 479-486 PMID32680914show ga
  • Preprint servers, such as arXiv and bioRxiv, have disrupted the scientific communication landscape by providing rapid access to research before peer review. medRxiv was launched as a free online repository for preprints in the medical, clinical, and related health sciences in 2019. In this review, we present the uptake of preprint server use in nephrology and discuss specific considerations regarding preprint server use in medicine. Distribution of kidney-related research on preprint servers is rising at an exponential rate. Survey of nephrology journals identified that 15 of 17 (88%) are publishing original research accepted submissions that have been uploaded to preprint servers. After reviewing 52 clinically impactful trials in nephrology discussed in the online Nephrology Journal Club (NephJC), an average lag of 300 days was found between study completion and publication, indicating an opportunity for faster research dissemination. Rapid review of papers discussing benefits and risks of preprint server use from the researcher, publisher, or end user perspective identified 53 papers that met criteria. Potential benefits of biomedical preprint servers included rapid dissemination, improved transparency of the peer review process, greater visibility and recognition, and collaboration. However, these benefits come at the risk of rapid spread of results not yet subjected to the rigors of peer review. Preprint servers shift the burden of critical appraisal to the reader. Media may be especially at risk due to their focus on "late-breaking" information. Preprint servers have played an even larger role when late-breaking research results are of special interest, such as during the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Coronavirus disease 2019 has brought both the benefits and risks of preprint servers to the forefront. Given the prominent online presence of the nephrology community, it is poised to lead the medicine community in appropriate use of preprint servers.
  • |*Access to Information[MESH]
  • |*Biomedical Research[MESH]
  • |*Information Dissemination[MESH]
  • |*Internet[MESH]
  • |*Kidney Diseases/diagnosis/physiopathology/therapy[MESH]
  • |*Nephrology[MESH]
  • |*Peer Review, Research[MESH]
  • |*Preprints as Topic[MESH]
  • |Animals[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Periodicals as Topic[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box