Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439 32674034!7235577!32674034     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Clin+Virol 2020 ; 129 (ä): 104439 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32674034|t=2020. SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |pdf=|usr=}}{{32674034}} gab.com Text SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples JO: J Clin Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32674034 #FOAvip Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity rate of 14.9 % (4428 of 29,713 samples tested). Distribution of results by birth year cohort and specimen type suggested general consistency in mean, median and peak values but higher positivity rates in individuals born from 1964 to 1974. Female patients had a significantly lower positivity rate (P < 0.0001), although similar load mean and median values, compared to males. Overall, 15.3 % (676 of 4428 positive results) of positive results had viral loads greater than 8 log10 copies/mL, with occasional samples exceeding 10 log10 copies/mL. These results support quantitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in patient testing and efforts to control viral transmission. Twit Text FOAVip SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples ????J Clin Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32674034 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32674034 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32674034}}</ref> SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples #MMPMID32674034 Kleiboeker S; Cowden S; Grantham J; Nutt J; Tyler A; Berg A; Altrich M J Clin Virol 2020[Aug]; 129 (ä): 104439 PMID32674034show ga Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity rate of 14.9 % (4428 of 29,713 samples tested). Distribution of results by birth year cohort and specimen type suggested general consistency in mean, median and peak values but higher positivity rates in individuals born from 1964 to 1974. Female patients had a significantly lower positivity rate (P < 0.0001), although similar load mean and median values, compared to males. Overall, 15.3 % (676 of 4428 positive results) of positive results had viral loads greater than 8 log10 copies/mL, with occasional samples exceeding 10 log10 copies/mL. These results support quantitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in patient testing and efforts to control viral transmission. |*Clinical Laboratory Techniques[MESH] |*Viral Load[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Age Factors[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |Betacoronavirus/*isolation & purification[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |COVID-19 Vaccines[MESH] |Child[MESH] |Child, Preschool[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis/*virology[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infant[MESH] |Infant, Newborn[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*virology[MESH] |Respiratory System/*virology[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Sex Factors[MESH]SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing