Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s11126-020-09796-5 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s11126-020-09796-5 32642822!7343383!32642822     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Psychiatr+Q 2020 ; 91 (4): 1033-1045 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32642822|t=2020. Mental Health During the Covid-19 Outbreak in China: a Meta-Analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{32642822}} gab.com Text Mental Health During the Covid-19 Outbreak in China: a Meta-Analysis JO: Psychiatr Q http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32642822 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Covid-19 has started to spread within China since the end of December 2019. Despite government's immediate actions and strict control, more and more people were infected every day. As such a contagious virus can spread easily and rapidly between people, the whole country was put into lockdown and people were forced into isolation. In order to understand the impact of Covid-19 on mental health well-being, Chinese researchers have conducted several studies. However, no consistent results were obtained. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted. METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to find literature from December 2019 to April 2020 related to Covid-19 and mental health, among which results such as comments, letters, reviews and case reports were excluded. The incidence of anxiety and depression in the population was synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: A total of 27,475 subjects were included in 12 studies. Random effect model is used to account for the data. The results showed that the incidence of anxiety was 25% (95% CI: 0.19-0.32), and the incidence of depression was 28% (95% CI: 0.17-0.38). Significant heterogeneity was detected across studies regarding these incidence estimates. Subgroup analysis included the study population and assessment tools, and sensitivity analysis was done to explore the sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the significant heterogeneity detected in studies regarding this pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression, we must interpret the results with caution. As the epidemic is ongoing, it is vital to set up a comprehensive crisis prevention system, which integrating epidemiological monitoring, screening and psychological crisis prevention and interventions. Twit Text FOAVip Mental Health During the Covid-19 Outbreak in China: a Meta-Analysis ????Psychiatr Q http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32642822 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32642822 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32642822}}</ref> Mental Health During the Covid-19 Outbreak in China: a Meta-Analysis #MMPMID32642822 Ren X; Huang W; Pan H; Huang T; Wang X; Ma Y Psychiatr Q 2020[Dec]; 91 (4): 1033-1045 PMID32642822show ga BACKGROUND: Covid-19 has started to spread within China since the end of December 2019. Despite government's immediate actions and strict control, more and more people were infected every day. As such a contagious virus can spread easily and rapidly between people, the whole country was put into lockdown and people were forced into isolation. In order to understand the impact of Covid-19 on mental health well-being, Chinese researchers have conducted several studies. However, no consistent results were obtained. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted. METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to find literature from December 2019 to April 2020 related to Covid-19 and mental health, among which results such as comments, letters, reviews and case reports were excluded. The incidence of anxiety and depression in the population was synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: A total of 27,475 subjects were included in 12 studies. Random effect model is used to account for the data. The results showed that the incidence of anxiety was 25% (95% CI: 0.19-0.32), and the incidence of depression was 28% (95% CI: 0.17-0.38). Significant heterogeneity was detected across studies regarding these incidence estimates. Subgroup analysis included the study population and assessment tools, and sensitivity analysis was done to explore the sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the significant heterogeneity detected in studies regarding this pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression, we must interpret the results with caution. As the epidemic is ongoing, it is vital to set up a comprehensive crisis prevention system, which integrating epidemiological monitoring, screening and psychological crisis prevention and interventions. |Anxiety/*epidemiology/psychology[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |China/epidemiology[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology[MESH] |Depression/*epidemiology/psychology[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Incidence[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Patient Health Questionnaire[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology[MESH] |Prevalence[MESH]Mental Health During the Covid-19 Outbreak in China: a Meta-Analysis (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing