Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.005 32631626!7298474!32631626     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Clin+Radiol 2020 ; 75 (9): 710.e9-710.e14 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32631626|t=2020. Validation of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging guidelines for COVID-19 chest radiograph reporting |pdf=|usr=}}{{32631626}} gab.com Text Validation of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging guidelines for COVID-19 chest radiograph reporting JO: Clin Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32631626 #FOAvip AIM: To validate the British Society of Thoracic Imaging issued guidelines for the categorisation of chest radiographs for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reporting regarding reproducibility amongst radiologists and diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest radiographs from 50 patients with COVID-19, and 50 control patients with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 from prior to the emergence of the novel coronavirus were assessed by seven consultant radiologists with regards to the British Society of Thoracic Imaging guidelines. RESULTS: The findings show excellent specificity (100%) and moderate sensitivity (44%) for guideline-defined Classic/Probable COVID-19, and substantial interobserver agreement (Fleiss' k=0.61). Fair agreement was observed for the "Indeterminate for COVID-19" (k=0.23), and "Non-COVID-19" (k=0.37) categories; furthermore, the sensitivity (0.26 and 0.14 respectively) and specificity (0.76, 0.80) of these categories for COVID-19 were not significantly different (McNemar's test p=0.18 and p=0.67). CONCLUSION: An amalgamation of the categories of "Indeterminate for COVID-19" and "Non-COVID-19" into a single "not classic of COVID-19" classification would improve interobserver agreement, encompass patients with a similar probability of COVID-19, and remove the possibility of labelling patients with COVID-19 as "Non-COVID-19", which is the presenting radiographic appearance in a significant minority (14%) of patients. Twit Text FOAVip Validation of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging guidelines for COVID-19 chest radiograph reporting ????Clin Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32631626 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32631626 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32631626}}</ref> Validation of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging guidelines for COVID-19 chest radiograph reporting #MMPMID32631626 Hare SS; Tavare AN; Dattani V; Musaddaq B; Beal I; Cleverley J; Cash C; Lemoniati E; Barnett J Clin Radiol 2020[Sep]; 75 (9): 710.e9-710.e14 PMID32631626show ga AIM: To validate the British Society of Thoracic Imaging issued guidelines for the categorisation of chest radiographs for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reporting regarding reproducibility amongst radiologists and diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest radiographs from 50 patients with COVID-19, and 50 control patients with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 from prior to the emergence of the novel coronavirus were assessed by seven consultant radiologists with regards to the British Society of Thoracic Imaging guidelines. RESULTS: The findings show excellent specificity (100%) and moderate sensitivity (44%) for guideline-defined Classic/Probable COVID-19, and substantial interobserver agreement (Fleiss' k=0.61). Fair agreement was observed for the "Indeterminate for COVID-19" (k=0.23), and "Non-COVID-19" (k=0.37) categories; furthermore, the sensitivity (0.26 and 0.14 respectively) and specificity (0.76, 0.80) of these categories for COVID-19 were not significantly different (McNemar's test p=0.18 and p=0.67). CONCLUSION: An amalgamation of the categories of "Indeterminate for COVID-19" and "Non-COVID-19" into a single "not classic of COVID-19" classification would improve interobserver agreement, encompass patients with a similar probability of COVID-19, and remove the possibility of labelling patients with COVID-19 as "Non-COVID-19", which is the presenting radiographic appearance in a significant minority (14%) of patients. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |*Practice Guidelines as Topic[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnostic imaging[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Lung/diagnostic imaging[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Observer Variation[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnostic imaging[MESH] |Polymerase Chain Reaction[MESH] |Radiography, Thoracic/*methods[MESH] |Reproducibility of Results[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]Validation of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging guidelines for C(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing